Teams

KY/LEX/McCubbin

2024 USTA LEAGUE 40 & Over ADULT LEXINGTON · Men 3.5

16 players · average NTRP 3.50 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-04-29Won 10
W#3 DoublesBentley Bradshaw / Gheorghe Ignat vs Jeffrey Jones / Clay Gatewood6-1, 6-2
2024-04-23vs KY/LEX/TALLONWon 10
W#2 DoublesGregory Miller / Gheorghe Ignat vs Bryson Perry / Don Schierer6-4, 6-2
2024-03-28vs KY/LEX/GrahamWon 10
W#1 DoublesGheorghe Ignat / Bentley Bradshaw vs Richard Lane / Onur Camur6-3, 6-4
2024-03-17Lost 01
L#4 DoublesRussell Coffey / Gheorghe Ignat vs Joseph Waldron / Don Jeffers0-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.07
William McCubbin
published
3.81
Santiago Bravo
published
3.50
Gregory Miller
published
3.50
Gheorghe Ignat
usually #3 Doubles 36%, also #4 Doubles 27% · published
3.49
Dwain Harris
published
3.33
Patrick Hancock
published
3.32
Chris Ensslin
published 3.5
3.28
Derrick Smith
published 3.5
Allen Dixon
published 3.5
Chris Adkisson
published 3.5
3.23
Bentley Bradshaw
published 3.5
3.16
Deron Polston
published 3.5
Daniel Gaddis
published
John McFall
published
Russell Coffey
published
Steve Johnston
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chris Ensslin + Gregory Miller4156% games−2.9% vs expected
Gheorghe Ignat + Gregory Miller404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

William McCubbin
48W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%31%69%
4.07
Santiago Bravo
14W–7L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.81
Gregory Miller
22W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
3.50
Gheorghe Ignat
212W–125L career · 11 lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
3.50
Dwain Harris
8W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%54%46%
3.49
Patrick Hancock
18W–14L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.33
3.5
Chris Ensslin
10W–2L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Derrick Smith
10W–16L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Allen Dixon
6W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Chris Adkisson
5W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Bentley Bradshaw
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Deron Polston
3W–2L career · type A · no lines in 2024
13%86%1%
3.16
Daniel Gaddis
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
John McFall
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Russell Coffey
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Steve Johnston
7W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.