Teams

Lost Forest

Mixed 18 & Over 6.0 - 10.0 · 7.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.67 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 DoublesNelson Castro / Maya Nortje vs Julio Garcia / Emily Moon6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJorge Namerow / Rebecca Haskin vs Kevin McGuirk / Kimberly Call1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAdrian Guzman / Meghan Ruble vs Oscar Mejia / Sara Bovolenta6-4, 6-3
2026-06-07vs LLTC - Chaos TheoryLost 12
W#1 DoublesNelson Castro / Maya Nortje vs Chris Tan / Lac-Hong Pham6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAnand Sankar / Yunfan Tao vs Zhi-Yuan Wang / Erika Jodloman1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAdrian Guzman / Meghan Ruble vs Patrick Chou / Tramy Nguyen2-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesNelson Castro / Maya Nortje vs Michael Pritchard / Andrianna Cole3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRobert Haskin / Rebecca Haskin vs Steve Tucker / Aksana Rajput0-1, 0-0
W#3 DoublesJorge Namerow / Meghan Ruble vs Gabriel Struve / Christy Smith6-4, 6-3
2026-05-24vs MPTC - Guardians of the GalaxyLost 03
L#1 DoublesTony Garcia / Vatsana Sou vs Neya Sterling / Matthew Liu5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRobert Haskin / Jiali Yang vs Luisa Fernanda Patoni Castilla / Ryan Iness2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJorge Namerow / Sara Mendoza vs Morgan Pinkleton / Ajai Hari6-7, 0-6
L#1 DoublesAdrian Guzman / Vatsana Sou vs Julio Garcia / Kimberly Call3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAnand Sankar / Allyse Michelsen vs Edgar Arceo / Megan Novak2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesNelson Castro / Sara Mendoza vs Timothy Pierce / Sara Bovolenta6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2026-05-03vs LLTC - Chaos TheoryLost 12
L#1 DoublesJorge Namerow / Rebecca Haskin vs Patrick Chou / Aimeng Ji4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesNelson Castro / Sara Mendoza vs Zhi-Yuan Wang / Lac-Hong Pham3-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesAdrian Guzman / Vatsana Sou vs Alan Lee / Chen Lee6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesNelson Castro / Meghan Ruble vs Brian Mourino / Gaby Dorough1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAdrian Guzman / Vatsana Sou vs Thomas Nguyen-Cao / Andrianna Cole6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAnand Sankar / Allyse Michelsen vs Gabriel Struve / Paola Tucker2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2026-04-19vs MPTC - Guardians of the GalaxyWon 30
W#1 DoublesTony Garcia / Meghan Ruble vs Maximino Linares Blasini / Luisa Fernanda Patoni Castilla6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAnand Sankar / Allyse Michelsen vs Freddy Soewito / Ana Morao6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAdrian Guzman / Vatsana Sou vs Deion Pena / Mariana Martinez6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Adrian Guzman
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.58
Nelson Castro
usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 42% · published
3.50
Vatsana Sou
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.45
Rebecca Haskin
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.42
Yunfan Tao
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.31
Allyse Michelsen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.30
Jiali Yang
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Anand Sankar
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.12
Jorge Namerow
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.89
Sara Mendoza
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.88
Meghan Ruble
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
Maya Nortje
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Robert Haskin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Tony Garcia
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Adrian Guzman + Vatsana Sou4348% gamesnot enough data
Jorge Namerow + Rebecca Haskin033 matchesnot enough data
Maya Nortje + Nelson Castro303 matchesnot enough data
Anand Sankar + Allyse Michelsen123 matchesnot enough data
Rebecca Haskin + Robert Haskin123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Adrian Guzman
7W–4L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
1%92%8%
3.81
Nelson Castro
41W–16L career · 12 lines in 2026
<1%26%74%
3.58
Vatsana Sou
30W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
3.50
Rebecca Haskin
26W–45L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
3.45
Yunfan Tao
14W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Allyse Michelsen
2W–10L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.31
Jiali Yang
25W–35L career · 1 line in 2026
1%92%7%
3.30
3.5
Anand Sankar
10W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
Jorge Namerow
31W–45L career · 4 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.12
Sara Mendoza
1W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.89
Meghan Ruble
59W–34L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
2.88
Maya Nortje
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Robert Haskin
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Tony Garcia
4W–11L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.