Teams

LW - Lacewell

2023 COASTAL PLAINS Adult 55 & OVER · 4.0 WOMEN 55 & over

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-05-08vs GR-Taylor 55s (SP 55s 4.0W)Won 10
W#2 DoublesSusan Omell / Cindy Rosplock vs Becky Hare / Carol Taylor6-0, 6-1
2023-04-23vs Baywood GirlsLost 01
L#1 DoublesSheryletta Lacewell / Lynise Devance vs Missy Barrow / Sangita Tewari1-6, 3-6
2023-04-18Won 10
W#3 DoublesCindy Rosplock / Sarah Baldwin vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-04-15vs Baywood GirlsLost 02
L#1 DoublesSheryletta Lacewell / Lynise Devance vs Missy Barrow / Sangita Tewari0-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesJoy Martin / Susan Omell vs Jarma Khoury / Wendy Price6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2023-03-28Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCynthia Jones / Lynise Devance vs Catherine Land / Pamela Moreau4-6, 1-6
2023-03-20vs Baywood GirlsWon 10
W#1 DoublesLynise Devance / Sheryletta Lacewell vs Diana Cox / Michele Mayo6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 WOMEN 55 & over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Lynise Devance
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Cynthia Jones
published 4
3.66
Susan Omell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.65
Joy Martin
published
3.59
Cindy Rosplock
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.51
Sheryletta Lacewell
published
3.42
Lynn Easley
published
3.41
Jeanette Sasser
published
3.02
Paige Temple
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joy Martin + Susan Omell4646% games−4.2% vs expected
Lynise Devance + Sheryletta Lacewell5066% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Lynise Devance
126W–71L career · 4 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Cynthia Jones
5W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Susan Omell
189W–247L career · 2 lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.66
Joy Martin
57W–78L career · no lines in 2023
14%86%1%
3.65
4
Cindy Rosplock
251W–166L career · 2 lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
3.59
Sheryletta Lacewell
14W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%<1%>99%
3.51
Lynn Easley
19W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%<1%>99%
3.42
Jeanette Sasser
12W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
3.41
Paige Temple
26W–22L career · no lines in 2023
<1%43%57%
3.02

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.