Teams

JHamlin/ACastellow (Hornets Nest)

2023 Adult 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Adult 3.0 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-05-08vs AStover/MLeisure (Blakeney)Lost 02
L#1 SinglesColleen Cappello vs Melissa Leisure4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMary Grace Wilder / Antoinette Tan vs Nickole Branch / Reshmi Santhosh0-6, 1-6
2023-05-04vs RAddison (Park Road)Won 10
W#1 SinglesColleen Cappello vs Anna Margaret Hutchins6-3, 6-3
2023-04-20vs AEagan/VSofarelli (WSRC)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesThalia Allen / Annie Spanjers vs Pamela Trantham / Christine Rasmussen1-6, 2-6
2023-04-06vs BBaker (Park Road)Split 11
W#1 SinglesColleen Cappello vs Katherine Koppel-Dobbs6-2, 0-0
L#3 DoublesAntoinette Tan / Robin Marks vs Lauren Spanos / Sarah Zolper2-6, 3-6
2023-03-30vs SChandler (Raintree)Won 10
W#3 DoublesEmilia Anderson / Colleen Cappello vs Rebecca Plaisance / Marie LeSaint6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesRobin Marks / Antoinette Tan vs Beth Dunn / Molly Clune3-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesColleen Cappello vs Annaliese Anderson0-6, 3-6
2023-03-17vs ADuncan (Col Beatty)Won 20
W#2 SinglesColleen Cappello vs Ree Snyder7-5, 7-5
W#3 DoublesThalia Allen / Antoinette Tan vs Jillian Doppalapudi / Ashley Duncan6-0, 7-5
2023-03-09vs RAddison (Park Road)Split 11
L#2 DoublesRobin Marks / Annie Spanjers vs Rachel Addison / Paige Cardell1-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesColleen Cappello vs Katherine Winfrey7-6, 6-1
2023-03-02vs AStover/MLeisure (Blakeney)Lost 01
L#1 SinglesColleen Cappello vs Melissa Leisure0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.13
Colleen Cappello
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 38% · published 3
3.10
Emma SEGAL
published 3
3.05
Emilia Anderson
published
2.93
Annie Spanjers
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.42
Antoinette Tan
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 3
2.30
Thalia Allen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Emma SEGAL + Emilia Anderson7168% games+8.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Colleen Cappello
41W–29L career · 8 lines in 2023
<1%18%82%
3.13
3
Emma SEGAL
28W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%24%76%
3.10
Emilia Anderson
37W–9L career · no lines in 2023
0%<1%>99%
3.05
3
Annie Spanjers
67W–70L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
2.93
3
Antoinette Tan
69W–117L career · type A · 10 lines in 2023
73%27%<1%
2.42
Thalia Allen
0W–7L career · no lines in 2023
0%92%8%
2.30

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.