Teams

GJTC ABEAGLEY

2021 CTA TWILIGHT - WS · WOMEN 2.5 - TWILIGHT - WS

5 players · average NTRP 2.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - TWILIGHT - WS have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.46 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.76
ROBIN MARTIN
published
2.36
Emma Wood
published 2.5
Ari Beagley
published 2.5
2.25
Mary Sterling
published
Jessica Boyer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

ROBIN MARTIN + Emma Wood134 matchesnot enough data
Ari Beagley + Mary Sterling033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

ROBIN MARTIN
48W–57L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%3%
2.76
2.5
Emma Wood
24W–49L career · no lines in 2021
0%85%15%
2.36
2.5
Ari Beagley
11W–26L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Mary Sterling
19W–51L career · no lines in 2021
97%3%<1%
2.25
Jessica Boyer
6W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.