Teams

OK-Reg-Peterson

18 & Over .5's Aug. 18-20 · 4.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 4.50 / OKLAHOMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings8 teams · 4.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1HOA-REG-Galloway000000
2IA-REG-Chase/Ellerbroek000000
3KS-REG-Kice/18&Over4.5W000000
4NE-REG-Tegler000000
5OK-Reg-Peterson000000
6STL-REG-Peterson/18&Over4.5W000000
7HOAWC-REG-McCulloch000000
8OKWC-Reg-Koumaris-Harless000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.16 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.32
Lindsay Myers
published
4.22
Julie Heil
published
4.20
Mandy Obana
published
4.20
Suzanne Peterson
published
4.16
Rachel Maras
published
4.14
3.88
Marisa Kendrick
published
Jessica Buie
published
Micaela McSpadden
published
Victoria Silva
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mandy Obana + Julie Heil7261% games−0.2% vs expected
Suzanne Peterson + Rachel Maras2450% games−1.6% vs expected
Mandy Obana + Lindsay Myers3745% games−6.4% vs expected
Marisa Kendrick + Julie Heil3355% games−8.5% vs expected
Mandy Obana + Suzanne Peterson134 matchesnot enough data
Suzanne Peterson + Julie Heil404 matchesnot enough data
Jessica Buie + Julie Heil303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lindsay Myers
70W–32L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
4.32
Julie Heil
59W–26L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
4.22
Mandy Obana
52W–52L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
4.20
Suzanne Peterson
61W–37L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
4.20
Rachel Maras
22W–14L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%<1%
4.16
4.5
Jacqueline Broussard
19W–26L career · no lines in 2023
14%86%<1%
4.14
Marisa Kendrick
70W–44L career · no lines in 2023
83%17%<1%
3.88
Jessica Buie
47W–45L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Micaela McSpadden
4W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Victoria Silva
16W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.