Teams

Je.Dysart18A

2025 Capital Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.44 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-05-06vs Je.Fogleman18ALost 13
L#1 DoublesJacqueline Wolborsky / Lauren Margulies vs Jolyne Taylor / Susan Dubach1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesKellie Chesson vs Holly Camak2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesJenna Dysart / Holli Swenson vs Wendy Burkard / Karen Gupton6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKaren Wakeford / Adria McGlamery vs Denise Turner / Alison Bernhardt6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2025-04-29vs Sh.Agresta18ALost 01
L#2 DoublesKellie Chesson / Lauren Margulies vs Marina Barthalmus / Shannon Phillips6-7, 5-7
2025-04-22vs An.Jones18ALost 02
L#1 SinglesCelia Whited vs Dianna Erwin2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKellie Chesson / Lauren Margulies vs Kelly Townsend / Marcy Points5-7, 5-7
2025-04-17Won 10
W#2 SinglesJenna Dysart vs Amy Clarke7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2025-04-14vs Cr.Smith18ALost 12
L#1 DoublesJenna Dysart / Lauren Margulies vs Sarah Maynard / Stacy Thiedeman1-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesCelia Whited vs Amanda Dawson6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesCristina Ennis / Adria McGlamery vs Elizabeth Easley / Emy Hanson3-6, 5-7
2025-03-25vs Mo.Collins18ASplit 11
W#1 DoublesLauren Margulies / Kellie Chesson vs Monica Collins / Natalie Regan6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesCara Kuremsky / Celia Whited vs Gretchen Swank / Ashley Walton4-6, 1-6
2025-03-11vs Me.George18AWon 40
W#1 SinglesCelia Whited vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJenna Dysart / Cara Kuremsky vs Jaime Clark / Joan Faulkner4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 SinglesJacqueline Wolborsky vs Katie Morrow4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLauren Margulies / Kellie Chesson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Beth Rives
published 3.5
Celia Whited
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Cristina Ennis
published 3.5
3.21
Jenna Dysart
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.21
Lauren Margulies
published
3.18
Jacqueline Wolborsky
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.15
Cara Kuremsky
published 3.5
3.08
Kellie Chesson
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.00
Karen Wakeford
published
2.90
Adria McGlamery
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.74
Jennifer Bissette
published
Holli Swenson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kellie Chesson + Jenna Dysart6747% games+12.0% vs expected
Celia Whited + Kellie Chesson7356% gamesnot enough data
Lauren Margulies + Kellie Chesson033 matchesnot enough data
Celia Whited + Jenna Dysart213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Beth Rives
5W–10L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Celia Whited
79W–80L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Cristina Ennis
0W–2L career · type A · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Jenna Dysart
97W–58L career · 4 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Lauren Margulies
2W–10L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Jacqueline Wolborsky
66W–45L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Cara Kuremsky
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.15
3.5
Kellie Chesson
107W–119L career · 5 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.08
Karen Wakeford
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
3.00
3
Adria McGlamery
54W–32L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%75%24%
2.90
Jennifer Bissette
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
4%92%3%
2.74
Holli Swenson
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.