Teams

OB-Miller

2025 Tri-Level 18 & Over Day Leagues - GS · 3.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.39 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-06-04vs GS - PorterLost 12
L#1 DoublesJill Middleton / Nicole Miller vs Debbie Mansell / Bernadette Gilliam6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLeanne Collins / Cheryl Scarbrough vs Stephanie Boll / Jamie Wood6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesGina Ivey / Amanda Williamson vs Leona Lenaz / Irina Matushchenko6-7, 4-6
2025-06-02vs GS - PorterLost 02
L#1 DoublesJill Middleton / Cheslie Larkin vs Jana Porter / Debbie Mansell4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesGina Ivey / Amanda Williamson vs Tika Policelli / Irina Matushchenko3-6, 2-6
2025-05-21vs GS - PorterLost 12
W#1 DoublesNicole Miller / Cheslie Larkin vs Bernadette Gilliam / Natalie Toups6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAmanda Williamson / Farrah Keel vs Jamie Wood / Tika Policelli7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesGina Ivey / Daria Yakovenko vs Jessica Lazzarino / Leona Lenaz2-6, 3-6
2025-05-14vs GS - PorterLost 03
L#1 DoublesFarrah Keel / Cheslie Larkin vs Jana Porter / Natalie Toups4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesLeanne Collins / Heather Sefton-Sterling vs Stephanie Boll / Ashley Wheeler2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesEnsley Keel / Amanda Williamson vs Irina Matushchenko / Jessica Lazzarino1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GS - Porter40102688
2OB-Miller0421021136

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Cheslie Larkin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
Jill Middleton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Farrah Keel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.26
Heather Sefton-Sterling
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Cheryl Scarbrough
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Amanda Hancock
published 3.5
3.05
Leanne Collins
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Daria Yakovenko
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Ensley Keel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Gina Ivey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.55
Amanda Williamson
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Nicole Miller
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leanne Collins + Heather Sefton-Sterling3243% games−10.3% vs expected
Farrah Keel + Cheslie Larkin123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cheslie Larkin
17W–24L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
Jill Middleton
11W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Farrah Keel
7W–36L career · 2 lines in 2025
95%5%<1%
3.29
3.5
Heather Sefton-Sterling
10W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Cheryl Scarbrough
3W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Amanda Hancock
3W–9L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
Leanne Collins
8W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.05
3
Daria Yakovenko
2W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3
Ensley Keel
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3
Gina Ivey
2W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Amanda Williamson
8W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
2.55
Nicole Miller
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.