Teams

OC LPC - Genesis Sat9

2023 USTA Mixed Doubles 18 & Over - OC · OC - 7.0 WE - Weekend Mixed Doubles

13 players · average NTRP 3.60 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-04-02vs OC CMTC - RickWon 10
W#1 DoublesMark Gross / Tricia Bregman vs Kurt Hubler / Linda Lyons6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKristen Petrovacki / Neb Petrovacki vs Jane Gee / Jason Ball7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2023-02-18vs OC Boomer MVPs - MVTC - GusLost 01
L#2 DoublesKristen Petrovacki / Praveen Chaudhary vs Gabriela Roman / Drake Sullivan4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKristen Petrovacki / Neb Petrovacki vs Jane Gee / Jason Ball7-6, 7-5
W#3 DoublesTricia Bregman / Mark Gross vs Stefan Manns / Kristi Wechsler6-1, 6-1
W#1 DoublesKristen Petrovacki / Neb Petrovacki vs HOANG VU HO / Mariana Chan6-0, 6-2
2023-01-21vs OC LNRC - BeraeilWon 10
W#1 DoublesTricia Bregman / Mark Gross vs Doug Frazier / Chantal Trillwood6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC - 7.0 WE - Weekend Mixed Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.22
Edmund Hsu
published
4.15
Eunice Han
published
3.91
Kristen Petrovacki
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.81
Tajoe Lun
published
Anton Jensen
published 4
3.56
Genesis Arreola
published
3.53
Patricia Santiago
published
3.36
Tricia Bregman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.33
Neb Petrovacki
published
3.29
Mark Gross
published
3.17
Alicia Callanan
published 3.5
2.67
Cindy Carpenter
published 3
Eugene Nguyen
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Edmund Hsu
10W–10L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
4.22
Eunice Han
9W–1L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%1%
4.15
4
Kristen Petrovacki
133W–41L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
3.91
Tajoe Lun
13W–5L career · no lines in 2023
91%9%<1%
3.81
4
Anton Jensen
0W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Genesis Arreola
13W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%33%67%
3.56
Patricia Santiago
4W–17L career · no lines in 2023
41%59%<1%
3.53
3.5
Tricia Bregman
114W–117L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
3.36
Neb Petrovacki
28W–14L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.33
Mark Gross
28W–14L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Alicia Callanan
17W–13L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.17
3
Cindy Carpenter
5W–11L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
2.67
Eugene Nguyen
8W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.