Teams

Refund

Holding · Holding

25 players · average NTRP 3.96 / NEW JERSEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings5 teams · Holding
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Refund000000
2Refund #2000000
3Holding #2000000
4TriLevel Holding000000
5test 1000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.26
Ting Zhang
published
Dennis Barlotta
published 4.5
Don Kim
published 4.5
4.10
Suzanne Favia
published 4.5
3.86
Ivy Brown
published 4
3.79
Aaron Palmer
published 4
3.77
Pavel Baresh
published
Diana Kimick
published 4
James Jeon
published 4
3.74
3.64
Ritch Belen
published 4
3.64
3.62
Nancy Silverman
published
3.33
Biswajit Datta
published 3.5
Andrew Thurston
published 3.5
Dave Pena
published 3.5
3.08
Doris Manahan
published 3.5
3.07
Kaitlin Apostol
published
2.69
Robin Wimberly
published
Jeffrey Lacasse
published
Jodi Jaffe
published
Karen Marlib
published
Lutfiye Ela Eren
published
Rong Li
published
Sharon Butterfield
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ting Zhang
24W–25L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%3%
4.26
4.5
Dennis Barlotta
41W–21L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4.5
Don Kim
48W–23L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4.5
Suzanne Favia
198W–131L career · no lines in 2021
23%77%<1%
4.10
4
Ivy Brown
153W–69L career · no lines in 2021
<1%85%14%
3.86
4
Aaron Palmer
107W–69L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%5%
3.79
Pavel Baresh
39W–53L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Diana Kimick
32W–25L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4
James Jeon
8W–7L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
VIJAYAKUMAR MURUGESAN
58W–19L career · no lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Ritch Belen
123W–137L career · no lines in 2021
14%85%<1%
3.64
Marva Matthews-Durden
47W–19L career · no lines in 2021
14%85%<1%
3.64
Nancy Silverman
172W–135L career · no lines in 2021
18%82%<1%
3.62
3.5
Biswajit Datta
78W–36L career · no lines in 2021
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Andrew Thurston
8W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Dave Pena
13W–25L career · type M · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Doris Manahan
64W–56L career · no lines in 2021
27%73%<1%
3.08
Kaitlin Apostol
68W–39L career · no lines in 2021
29%71%<1%
3.07
Robin Wimberly
71W–62L career · no lines in 2021
7%92%1%
2.69
Jeffrey Lacasse
18W–14L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Jodi Jaffe
88W–71L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Karen Marlib
20W–22L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Lutfiye Ela Eren
53W–42L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Rong Li
23W–6L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Sharon Butterfield
38W–33L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.