Teams

WB: Meyer/Pembroke

2022 RI Adult 40 & Over Women · 3.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.60 / RHODE ISLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-07-21vs EB: GuglielmoSplit 22
L#1 DoublesRose Pembroke / Caroline Ceceri vs Sheila Rinaldi / Susan Dressler6-4, 2-6, 4-2
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Carrison vs Jennifer Arkuss3-3
W#2 DoublesKaren Meyer / Leslie Beaulieu vs Faye Wisen / Christine Munro6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDaniella Norwood / Danielle Salisbury vs Connie Howes / Noelle Vitt6-2, 6-0
W#1 DoublesRose Pembroke / Caroline Ceceri vs Annette Paiva / Jennifer Witt6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesElizabeth Carrison vs Marylou Ferri6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesNikki Kavanagh / Karen Meyer vs Mary Juntunen / Christine Fera6-3, 1-6, 3-2
W#3 DoublesDaniella Norwood / Danielle Salisbury vs Saskia Schulte Vennema / Caren Lioce3-6, 6-1, 3-0
2022-07-10vs RP: Joan SteereLost 04
L#1 DoublesNikki Kavanagh / Trisha Lynch vs Michelle Carney / Jen Greene2-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesRose Pembroke vs JENNY QI0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Meyer / Caroline Ceceri vs Sandra O'Leary / Deb Gordinier1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLeslie Lawton / Dana Padula vs MaryAnne Borges / Dawn Curran3-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesKaren Meyer / Caroline Ceceri vs Kathleen Farrell / Deborah Golden6-2, 4-6, 5-3
L#1 SinglesRose Pembroke vs Derri Braun6-4, 1-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDaniella Norwood / Linda Ford vs Susan English / Roseanne Simmons5-7, 6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLeslie Beaulieu / Danielle Salisbury vs Linda Snodgrass / Pamela Wyatt6-0, 6-1
2022-06-21vs CC: All About Me/Robertson/PreveWon 40
W#1 DoublesNikki Kavanagh / Trisha Lynch vs Valerie Welch / Deborah Robertson7-6, 6-3
W#1 SinglesElizabeth Carrison vs Lynne Turner7-5, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLeslie Lawton / Dana Padula vs Staci Paletta / Roberta Preve6-4, 4-6, 3-2
W#3 DoublesKaren Meyer / Rose Pembroke vs Julie Reitzas / Cheryl Poisson6-4, 6-4
2022-06-17vs CC: All About Me/Robertson/PreveLost 13
L#1 DoublesLeslie Beaulieu / Caroline Ceceri vs Alice Kim / Carol Johnson6-4, 3-6, 3-2
L#1 SinglesLeslie Lawton vs Meighan Blanco4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesKaren Meyer / Rose Pembroke vs Chryssa Udvardy / Valerie Welch2-6, 7-5, 2-0
W#3 DoublesNikki Kavanagh / Trisha Lynch vs Staci Paletta / Roberta Preve6-3, 6-2
W#1 DoublesRose Pembroke / Caroline Ceceri vs Kathleen Farrell / Elizabeth Hale6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesElizabeth Carrison vs Katie Maloney6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKaren Meyer / Leslie Beaulieu vs Deborah Golden / Elena Litmanovich6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDanielle Salisbury / Daniella Norwood vs Pamela Wyatt / Linda Snodgrass3-6, 5-4, 1-0
W#1 DoublesKaren Meyer / Rose Pembroke vs Annette Paiva / Mary Juntunen6-2, 6-7, 3-1
W#1 SinglesKimberly Koness vs Marylou Ferri6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLeslie Lawton / Dana Padula vs Patricia Cooper / Denise Diorio6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesNikki Kavanagh / Leslie Beaulieu vs Erica Doran / Saskia Schulte Vennema6-0, 6-4
2022-06-05vs EB: GuglielmoWon 40
W#1 DoublesKaren Meyer / Rose Pembroke vs Patricia Weiner / Jennifer Arkuss7-5, 6-1
W#1 SinglesKimberly Koness vs Jennifer Rashleigh6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDaniella Norwood / Linda Ford vs Barbara Guglielmo / Sheila Rinaldi2-6, 6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDana Padula / Caroline Ceceri vs Diane Sullivan / Lori Heywood6-4, 3-6, 6-2
2022-05-22vs RP: Joan SteereLost 13
L#1 DoublesLeslie Lawton / Dana Padula vs Jen Greene / Michelle Carney3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Carrison vs JENNY QI5-7, 1-4
L#2 DoublesRose Pembroke / Caroline Ceceri vs Mary Lou Kennedy / MaryAnne Borges7-5, 3-6, 4-3
W#3 DoublesKaren Meyer / Nikki Kavanagh vs Lauri Burke / Dawn Curran6-3, 4-6, 4-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · 3.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1HOF: Freitas/Gardner010281229319
2WB: Josloff/Siener010271333340
3WB: Meyer/Pembroke010271336326
4RP: Collins010241642386
5CC: All About Me/Robertson/Preve010211942375
6EB: Guglielmo010182250402
7RP: Zebras/Gray/Chace010162456427
8WB: 40 Plus Rockstars/Salvator/Pezza010152559442
9FC: Chicks With Sticks/Golden/Ferretti010122859433
10FC: Siempre Tennis/Fontes/Etienvre010103063458
11RP: Slice Sisters 2.0/Schulte/Paiva010103064447

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Elizabeth Carrison
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.42
Leslie Lawton
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
3.28
Linda Ford
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Rose Pembroke
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Danielle Salisbury
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Dana Padula
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.21
Daniella Norwood
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.07
Caroline Ceceri
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Karen Meyer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
Kimberly Koness
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Leslie Beaulieu
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Nikki Kavanagh
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Trisha Lynch
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Daniella Norwood + Linda Ford5355% games+5.1% vs expected
Caroline Ceceri + Leslie Beaulieu3549% games+3.5% vs expected
Trisha Lynch + Nikki Kavanagh211553% games+1.2% vs expected
Rose Pembroke + Caroline Ceceri171652% games+1.2% vs expected
Caroline Ceceri + Linda Ford71047% games+0.6% vs expected
Dana Padula + Leslie Beaulieu14262% games+0.6% vs expected
Danielle Salisbury + Rose Pembroke8255% games+0.5% vs expected
Dana Padula + Leslie Lawton211054% games−0.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Elizabeth Carrison
33W–19L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Leslie Lawton
49W–55L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
3.42
Linda Ford
40W–30L career · 2 lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.28
Rose Pembroke
90W–76L career · 10 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Danielle Salisbury
19W–6L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Dana Padula
58W–34L career · 5 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Daniella Norwood
28W–19L career · 5 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Caroline Ceceri
57W–55L career · 8 lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.07
Karen Meyer
35W–30L career · 10 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kimberly Koness
2W–16L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Leslie Beaulieu
29W–17L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Nikki Kavanagh
33W–18L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Trisha Lynch
24W–15L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.