Teams

BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 55AW7.0A

2025 ADULT 55&Over · Women 7.0

19 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Robyn Vanderluit
published
3.53
Hilary Butler
published
3.40
Karen Rogge
published
3.34
Debby Heicklen
published 3.5
3.33
Gail Fong
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published
3.27
Deena Elfar
published 3.5
3.27
Michelle Blake
published
3.27
Marnie Mar
published
3.25
Cathleen Ligman
published 3.5
3.23
Liz Lawler
published
3.21
3.13
Patrizia Fazeli
published
3.11
Inna Cantor
published
3.08
Shawna Ballard
published
3.02
Gigi Harvey
published
2.98
Vera Parengkuan
published
2.91
Melissa Vuckovich
published
2.82
Mai Tran
published
Katrina Heiles
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Theresa Dao-Makiyama + Vera Parengkuan4148% gamesnot enough data
Debby Heicklen + Theresa Dao-Makiyama224 matchesnot enough data
Debby Heicklen + Deena Elfar134 matchesnot enough data
Gigi Harvey + Melissa Vuckovich033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Robyn Vanderluit
9W–14L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%2%
3.72
Hilary Butler
15W–22L career · no lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.53
Karen Rogge
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.40
3.5
Debby Heicklen
23W–25L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
Gail Fong
100W–56L career · 11 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
3.5
Deena Elfar
20W–34L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Michelle Blake
10W–13L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Marnie Mar
6W–16L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Cathleen Ligman
11W–13L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Liz Lawler
10W–8L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Theresa Dao-Makiyama
9W–12L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
Patrizia Fazeli
9W–14L career · no lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.13
Inna Cantor
6W–11L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11
Shawna Ballard
17W–14L career · no lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.08
Gigi Harvey
6W–16L career · no lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
3.02
Vera Parengkuan
13W–15L career · no lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.98
Melissa Vuckovich
17W–26L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.91
Mai Tran
2W–13L career · no lines in 2025
90%10%<1%
2.82
Katrina Heiles
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.