Teams

WI Adult MidTri Singles Men Lake Geneva Arreazola

2026 WI Other · WI Adult MidTri Singles Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.80 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-05-17Split 11
W#1 SinglesMark Sansait vs Eric Czarnecki6-2, 6-0
L#3 SinglesEli Stickney vs Shaleen Deep0-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesMark Sansait vs Sujay K Shankar6-2, 6-4
L#3 SinglesChristian Voskuil vs Daniel Jing6-0, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMark Sansait vs August LePique1-6, 5-7
W#3 SinglesChristian Voskuil vs Ulugbek Kamilov6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesJonathan Figueira vs Sujay K Shankar0-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 SinglesEli Stickney vs Christopher Cusack2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesMark Sansait vs Andrew Liu6-2, 6-4
W#3 SinglesChristian Voskuil vs Daniel Jing4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2026-03-21Won 10
W#1 SinglesMark Sansait vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-03-01Won 20
W#1 SinglesMark Sansait vs Andrew Liu6-2, 6-4
W#2 SinglesMike Beffel vs Enes Akyuz6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesJonathan Figueira vs August LePique6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesMike Beffel vs Eric Czarnecki6-3, 6-1
L#3 SinglesMatt Trowbridge vs Daniel Jing2-6, 0-6
2026-02-15Won 20
W#1 SinglesJonathan Figueira vs Andrew Liu4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesChristian Voskuil vs Christopher Cusack6-2, 6-3
2026-02-01Won 10
W#1 SinglesMark Sansait vs Max Bohn7-6, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WI Adult MidTri Singles Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.40
Jonathan Figueira
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.32
Mark Sansait
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.09
Mike Beffel
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.99
Alex Dundas
usually #1 Singles 36%, also #2 Singles 36% · published 4
3.85
Trish Arreazola
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.54
Christian Voskuil
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Matt Trowbridge
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.68
Eli Stickney
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
Shane Jones
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jonathan Figueira
89W–54L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
4.40
4.5
Mark Sansait
72W–26L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%89%9%
4.32
Mike Beffel
23W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%25%75%
4.09
4
Alex Dundas
128W–83L career · 11 lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
3.99
Marius Dornhagen Schradermeier
21W–37L career · no lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.88
4
Trish Arreazola
51W–57L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
3.85
3.5
Christian Voskuil
16W–12L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
<1%37%63%
3.54
Matt Trowbridge
18W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
4%92%3%
3.24
3
Eli Stickney
2W–5L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
9%89%1%
2.68
Shane Jones
3W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.