Teams

HHTL (A) 4.0M 70 & Over (Tupper)

Adult 70 & Over - SC · Men 4.0

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Flight standings1 teams · Men 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1HHTL (A) 4.0M 70 & Over (Tupper)000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Mike McVey
published
Douglas Luba
published 4
3.68
Stephen Tufft
published
3.66
Wendell Anderson
published
3.65
Robert Higgins
published
3.57
Howard Freilich
published 4
3.46
Richard Silver
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
John Tupper
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mike McVey
19W–12L career · no lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.93
4
Douglas Luba
1W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Stephen Tufft
7W–4L career · no lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.68
Wendell Anderson
35W–20L career · no lines in 2026
11%89%<1%
3.66
Robert Higgins
33W–12L career · no lines in 2026
12%87%<1%
3.65
4
Howard Freilich
14W–24L career · no lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.57
Richard Silver
4W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%62%38%
3.46
John Tupper
5W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.