Teams

Mona's Team

2022 Adult Mixed 55 & Over League · 8.0 Sr Mixed Doubles

6 players · average NTRP 3.67 / MISSOURI

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-10-06vs MO/Huong/55&Over8.0MXDWon 21
L#1 DoublesMona Palmer / David Lane vs Dennis Mailes / Carol Mailes0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesRandy Smith / Cheryl Ballou vs Christina Johnson / Steven Yancey6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJohn Bunselmeyer / Nancy Rahmeyer vs Debbie Pell / Greg Grider6-4, 6-1
2022-09-29vs MO/Huong/55&Over8.0MXDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMona Palmer / David Lane vs Carol Mailes / Dennis Mailes2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCheryl Ballou / Randy Smith vs Julie Skinner / Steven Yancey6-3, 6-0
2022-09-22vs MO/Huong/55&Over8.0MXDLost 02
L#1 DoublesMona Palmer / Randy Smith vs Dennis Mailes / Carol Mailes2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesNancy Rahmeyer / John Bunselmeyer vs Julie Skinner / Steven Yancey2-6, 2-6
2022-09-15vs MO/Huong/55&Over8.0MXDLost 12
L#1 DoublesCheryl Ballou / Randy Smith vs Dennis Mailes / Julie Skinner1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJohn Bunselmeyer / Nancy Rahmeyer vs Steven Yancey / Debbie Pell6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDavid Lane / Mona Palmer vs Greg Grider / Christina Johnson1-6, 3-6
2022-09-08vs MO/Huong/55&Over8.0MXDWon 21
W#1 DoublesMona Palmer / David Lane vs Steven Yancey / Julie Skinner7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesCheryl Ballou / Randy Smith vs Dennis Mailes / Carol Mailes7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesNancy Rahmeyer / John Bunselmeyer vs Greg Grider / Christina Johnson3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-09-01vs MO/Huong/55&Over8.0MXDWon 20
W#1 DoublesRandy Smith / Cheryl Ballou vs Greg Grider / Julie Skinner7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJohn Bunselmeyer / Nancy Rahmeyer vs Dennis Mailes / Carol Mailes6-3, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Sr Mixed Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
John Bunselmeyer
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Cynthia Thibault
published 4
3.42
Cheryl Ballou
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
David Lane
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Mona Palmer
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Nancy Rahmeyer
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Rahmeyer + John Bunselmeyer4157% gamesnot enough data
Mona Palmer + David Lane134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

John Bunselmeyer
14W–4L career · 5 lines in 2022
94%6%<1%
3.79
4
Cynthia Thibault
9W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Cheryl Ballou
52W–52L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
David Lane
10W–17L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Mona Palmer
34W–24L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Nancy Rahmeyer
31W–25L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.