← Teams

SHC-Butrick

2025 Adult 65 & Over · 6.0 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.89
Mike Baker
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.75
Jim George
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
—
Les Wellman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.73
Doug Cumming
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.73
Scott Havens
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.65
Kerry Sweet
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.61
William Place
published 3
2.50
Larry Butrick
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
—
LAWRENCE HIPSHMAN
published 0
Results8 ties
2025-05-16Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesKeith Jones / Doug Cumming vs Philip Rothrock / Christopher Thomas6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLarry Butrick / Christopher Hermanski vs Eugene Avery / Fred Kowell6-1, 6-0
2025-05-08Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesMike Baker / Keith Jones vs Jeff Sunshine / Robert Piercy6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesKerry Sweet / Gary Rebello vs Lee Wiegand / Ken Bolton6-0, 6-0
2025-04-29Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesJim George / Terry Casebeer vs Robert Piercy / Charles Stewart6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMike Baker / Scott Havens vs Evan Cohn / Robert Hillison6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesDoug Cumming / Kerry Sweet vs Steve Russell / Wesley Eader6-0, 6-3
2025-04-24Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesJim George / Mike Baker vs Ken Dragoon / Scott Quinn6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDoug Cumming / Kerry Sweet vs Jeremy Geschwind / Dave Sasaki6-0, 6-2
2025-04-10Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesKerry Sweet / Bob Anderson vs Philip Rothrock / Christopher Thomas6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJim George / Terry Casebeer vs Dave Brown / Fred Kowell6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMike Baker / Scott Havens vs Eugene Avery / James Lang6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2025-04-03Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesJim George / Terry Casebeer vs Jeremy Geschwind / Dave Sasaki6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDoug Cumming / Scott Havens vs Ed de la Fuente / James Carey7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesLarry Butrick / Kerry Sweet vs Robert Hesslink / Paul Preston6-2, 6-2
2025-03-28Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesKeith Jones / Kerry Sweet vs Douglas Walker / Charles Martin1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJim George / Terry Casebeer vs William DelPlato / John Miletich7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLes Wellman / Doug Cumming vs Victor Regner / Jim Mounts6-3, 6-4
2025-03-20Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesJim George / Terry Casebeer vs John Miletich / Steve Snyder2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLes Wellman / Doug Cumming vs William DelPlato / Allen VanLeuven6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKeith Jones / Kerry Sweet vs Douglas Walker / Charles Martin7-6, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3
Mike Baker
47W–91L career
0%96%4%
2.89
3
Jim George
30W–21L career
3%95%2%
2.75
3
Les Wellman
43W–42L career
not enough data
—
3
Doug Cumming
27W–25L career
1%99%0%
2.73
3
Scott Havens
4W–10L career
6%92%2%
2.73
3
Kerry Sweet
31W–63L career
5%95%0%
2.65
3
William Place
31W–50L career
14%86%0%
2.61
3
Larry Butrick
47W–55L career
37%63%0%
2.50
0
LAWRENCE HIPSHMAN
2W–15L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.