Teams

Chief Peak

2025 USTA Adult 18 & Over - Ventura · Ventura - Men 4.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.70 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-05-31vs WC V PRC PelicansLost 13
L#1 DoublesBala Natarajan / John Selzer vs Chris Trama / Jeremy Tuite0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesSiddharth Sood vs Nathan Waxer0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDanny Everett / Michael Matisek vs Erik Bars / Chris Sanchez2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesDavid Jones / Dana Files vs David Raulin / Steve Johnson6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Dana Files
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.84
Jonathan Twena
published
3.75
Sachin Agrahar
published
3.73
Lorenzo Wright
published
3.69
Siddharth Sood
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.58
Dj Pierce
published
3.55
Danny Everett
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.53
Rob Brower
published
3.29
Lee Tsai
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Anthony Kassar
published 3.5
Howard Radding
published
John Selzer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Michael Matisek
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Robert Freeman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Danny Everett + Dana Files314 matchesnot enough data
Rob Brower + Danny Everett123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dana Files
7W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.93
Jonathan Twena
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.84
4
Christopher Bashor
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sachin Agrahar
13W–2L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.75
Lorenzo Wright
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Siddharth Sood
6W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
8%90%1%
3.69
Dj Pierce
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
27%72%<1%
3.58
3.5
Danny Everett
7W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.55
Rob Brower
4W–7L career · no lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.53
3.5
Lee Tsai
212W–155L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Anthony Kassar
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Howard Radding
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
John Selzer
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Michael Matisek
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Robert Freeman
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.