Teams

NNM 8.0M HP - Martello

2022 USTA Adult 55 & Over League - NNM · 8.0 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHERN NEW MEXICO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-07-10vs NNM 8.0M TCA - LagattutaWon 30
W#1 DoublesRoy McKinney / Kevin Garver vs Bill Lagattuta / John Jewett7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTom Weeks / Daniel Stephens vs Peter Burton / Chris Philips6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesKenneth Harper / Scott Jamison vs Alan Blair / Walter Simpson6-3, 7-6
2022-07-09vs NNM 8.0 JC - RisingLost 12
W#1 DoublesKevin Garver / Scott Jamison vs David Eisert / Douglas Oltmans6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKenneth Harper / Roy McKinney vs Jae Lee / David Walsh2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesTy Martello / Daniel Stephens vs Daniel McClanahan / Hal Byrd2-6, 3-6
2022-06-23vs NNM 8.0M TCA - FriedmanLost 03
L#1 DoublesKevin Garver / Sherman Garver vs Mark Friedman / Patrick Sullivan4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKenneth Harper / Mark Wallenbrock vs Eli Lee / Jeffrey Hagemann4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesPeter Korsan / Tom Arnold vs Chris Charrlin / Rick McCormick4-6, 6-0, 0-1
2022-06-18vs NNM 8.0M EG - BechtoldWon 21
L#1 DoublesKevin Garver / Sherman Garver vs Peter Martin / Roger Prucino5-7, 5-7
W#2 DoublesTom Arnold / Kenneth Harper vs Frederick Ellis / Stephen Post7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTy Martello / Scott Jamison vs Rich Bechtold / William Robertson6-4, 6-4
2022-06-13vs NNM 8.0M VR - RomeroWon 30
W#1 DoublesKevin Garver / Sherman Garver vs Marck Wright / Mark Carlisle6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTom Weeks / Roy McKinney vs Paul Pfeiff / Clarence Sanchez6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMark Wallenbrock / Peter Korsan vs Jeff Cummings / Jerome Romero6-0, 7-5
2022-06-12vs NNM 8.0 JC - RisingWon 30
W#1 DoublesMark Wallenbrock / Tom Arnold vs Kevin Wiley / Douglas Oltmans6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKevin Garver / Sherman Garver vs Leon Redman / Jae Lee6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesTy Martello / Scott Jamison vs David Eisert / Daniel McClanahan7-6, 6-2
2022-06-09vs NNM 8.0M HP - GeeWon 30
W#1 DoublesKevin Garver / Sherman Garver vs Frank Duran / Mike Murphy6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesTy Martello / Scott Jamison vs Steve Wyrick / Christopher Gibbon6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesPeter Korsan / Daniel Stephens vs Robert Beavis / Glenn Li0-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-06-01vs NNM 8.0M HP - GeeWon 30
W#1 DoublesTom Weeks / Kenneth Harper vs James Gee / Larry Schneider6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMark Wallenbrock / Daniel Stephens vs Daniel Friedman / Robert Beavis6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTom Arnold / Roy McKinney vs Glenn Li / John Cilke6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Kenneth Harper
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Daniel Stephens
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Kevin Garver
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
Mark Wallenbrock
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Peter Korsan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roy McKinney
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Scott Jamison
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Sherman Garver
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Tom Arnold
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Tom Weeks
published
Ty Martello
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kenneth Harper + Peter Korsan20459% games+6.9% vs expected
Daniel Stephens + Peter Korsan4255% gamesnot enough data
Daniel Stephens + Roy McKinney5166% gamesnot enough data
Kevin Garver + Sherman Garver3253% gamesnot enough data
Kenneth Harper + Roy McKinney224 matchesnot enough data
Kenneth Harper + Mark Wallenbrock224 matchesnot enough data
Kenneth Harper + Tom Arnold404 matchesnot enough data
Daniel Stephens + Ty Martello224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kenneth Harper
53W–26L career · 5 lines in 2022
81%19%<1%
3.38
3.5
Daniel Stephens
31W–19L career · type A · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kevin Garver
5W–2L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
Mark Wallenbrock
51W–31L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Peter Korsan
48W–24L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Roy McKinney
32W–16L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Scott Jamison
22W–20L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sherman Garver
3W–2L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Tom Arnold
16W–10L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Tom Weeks
8W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Ty Martello
17W–13L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.