Teams

HMTC BLUE

2024 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 9.0 - 55 & OVER

6 players · average NTRP 4.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-07-13vs CROWN YELLOWWon 30
W#1 DoublesSuzanne Hale / Mitzi Johnson vs Karen Lambert / Janet Leverson6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesGail Draper / Kaili Young vs Susan Cheney / Sandra Kay Miller7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAmy Berkner / Kim Phillips vs Laurie Feler / Nancy Zeigel7-6, 6-2
2024-07-13vs HCC GREENWon 20
W#1 DoublesGail Draper / Suzanne Hale vs Tanya Brennan / Norma Landa7-5, 7-5
W#2 DoublesAmy Berkner / Kaili Young vs Kim Anderson / Jenifer Burger6-1, 6-3
2024-07-12vs MEMPK REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesMitzi Johnson / Suzanne Hale vs Shawna Walker / Allyson McCale6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesKim Phillips / Amy Berkner vs Deborah Jones / Sue Barone7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRhonda Bruschke / Gail Draper vs Vicky Mediate / Rachel Shlossman7-6, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 9.0 - 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.07 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.29
Kaili Young
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.21
Suzanne Hale
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.11
Gail Draper
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.11
Amy Berkner
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.95
Mitzi Johnson
published
3.78
Kim Phillips
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kaili Young + Mitzi Johnson4553% games+6.3% vs expected
Gail Draper + Amy Berkner10267% games+3.7% vs expected
Suzanne Hale + Mitzi Johnson4154% games+0.5% vs expected
Gail Draper + Suzanne Hale4255% gamesnot enough data
Gail Draper + Kaili Young4254% gamesnot enough data
Kaili Young + Amy Berkner314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Kaili Young
68W–60L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
4.29
4.5
Suzanne Hale
133W–73L career · 3 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
4.21
4.5
Gail Draper
154W–75L career · 3 lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
4.11
4.5
Amy Berkner
100W–54L career · 3 lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
4.11
Mitzi Johnson
19W–18L career · no lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
3.95
Kim Phillips
13W–12L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.78

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.