Teams

McKinney/Jacobs-Chapman W4.0

2025 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S W. Thursday League

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-06-17Lost 01
L#3 DoublesTraci Barnes / Holly Carraway vs Marnie Pizzitola / Christina Perron3-6, 5-7
2025-05-29vs Lakewood/Diaz-Dix W4.0Won 10
W#3 DoublesAmy Farrell / Sarah Haskins vs Alexandra Klitsch / Sally Stephenson6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for S W. Thursday League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Farah Ashmore
published
3.84
Holly Carraway
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.83
Katheryn Ross
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.83
Lachrista Whatley
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.78
Lia Allen
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.76
Tanya Clay
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.65
Michelle McGuire
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.59
Julie Piatas
published
3.42
Brandi Ciufi
published 3.5
3.29
Amanda Bodnar
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.17
Emily Chapman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Holly Valtierra
published
Sally Purdy
published
Sarah Haskins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Traci Barnes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lachrista Whatley + Tanya Clay4163% gamesnot enough data
Tanya Clay + Lia Allen224 matchesnot enough data
Katheryn Ross + Sarah Haskins314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Farah Ashmore
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.87
Holly Carraway
17W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.84
Katheryn Ross
18W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
1%88%12%
3.83
Lachrista Whatley
24W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
Lia Allen
9W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
Tanya Clay
11W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.76
Michelle McGuire
9W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.65
Julie Piatas
11W–6L career · no lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.59
3.5
Brandi Ciufi
4W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Amanda Bodnar
8W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Emily Chapman
11W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
99%1%<1%
3.17
Holly Valtierra
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sally Purdy
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sarah Haskins
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Traci Barnes
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.