Teams

LA - Shadow's Aces

2024 USTA Adult 40 & Over – LA · LA - Women 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-04-07vs LA - Victorious SecretWon 10
W#1 DoublesSusan Warner / Christine Whigham vs Erin Mand / Alexis Cittadine6-3, 7-6
2024-03-17vs LA - Kiss My AceWon 10
W#1 DoublesAli Laventhol / Susan Warner vs Laura Branigan / Julie Vlasak6-1, 6-2
2024-02-25vs LA -LLW-LATC-Lara FermanisLost 02
L#1 DoublesAli Laventhol / Christine Whigham vs Lara Fermanis / Ilene Rosenzweig1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSuzie Sarkisian / Regina Gov vs Shauna Cross / Karen Chou3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2024-02-03vs LA - Victorious SecretLost 01
L#2 DoublesJenny Bond / Christine Whigham vs Erin Mand / Maisie Short6-7, 5-7
2024-01-28vs LA - MountainGate GatorsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAli Laventhol / Susan Warner vs Betty Shalom / Casondra Ruga6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesHarriet Fraser / Suzie Sarkisian vs Sheila Vasan / Simone Friedman5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2024-01-14vs LA - Canyon Coyotes 3.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesAli Laventhol / Christine Whigham vs Christine Russell / Catie Langston6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Stephanie Rudy
published
3.31
Harriet Fraser
published
3.23
Christine Whigham
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.22
Ali Laventhol
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Susan Warner
published
3.15
Allison Langus
published 3.5
3.10
Jenny Bond
published
3.08
Regina Gov
published
3.06
Suzie Sarkisian
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.00
Yasaman Barmaki
published
Ginger Vasquez
published
Sarah Nist
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ali Laventhol + Christine Whigham372154% games−1.7% vs expected
Susan Warner + Allison Langus2347% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stephanie Rudy
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.62
Harriet Fraser
17W–12L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%8%
3.31
3.5
Christine Whigham
132W–75L career · 4 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Ali Laventhol
163W–119L career · 4 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
Susan Warner
18W–21L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Allison Langus
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%1%
3.15
Jenny Bond
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
3.10
Regina Gov
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.08
Suzie Sarkisian
59W–50L career · 2 lines in 2024
35%65%<1%
3.06
Yasaman Barmaki
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
51%49%<1%
3.00
Ginger Vasquez
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sarah Nist
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.