Teams

No Can Run

2026 Adult 65 and Over League · 8.0 Men

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / OAHU

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-08-22vs Kaneohe CrewLost 12
L#1 DoublesLee Couillard / Paul Diehl vs Tom Roerk / Bruce Nagel0-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAlfred Chow / Curtis Kam vs David Parish / Gene Ching6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesGary Au Young / Michael Hamasu vs Kevin Inn / Corey Au6-7, 6-0, 0-1
2026-08-21vs OC BoomersWon 30
W#1 DoublesGary Au Young / Michael Hamasu vs Lee Conching / Jeffrey Wong6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAlfred Chow / Kurtis Derell vs David Kula / Greg Cleland6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLee Couillard / Paul Diehl vs Jamie Jeffryes / Sankaran Krishna6-2, 6-1
2026-08-01vs Kaneohe CrewWon 21
W#1 DoublesCurtis Kam / Kurtis Derell vs Tony Wilson / Bruce Nagel3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesGerald Davis / Paul Diehl vs Michael Park / Kevin Inn6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesGary Au Young / Alfred Chow vs Gene Ching / David Parish4-6, 0-6
2026-07-25vs OC BoomersWon 30
W#1 DoublesGary Au Young / Kurtis Derell vs Greg Cleland / Lee Conching6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesWilliam Liston / Alfred Chow vs David Kula / Jeffrey Wong6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCurtis Kam / Gilbert Fernandes vs Dick Rankin / Robert Golambos6-1, 6-2
2026-07-12vs Kaneohe CrewWon 21
W#1 DoublesWilliam Liston / Gilbert Fernandes vs Tod Tanaka / Bruce Nagel6-2, 7-6
L#2 DoublesGary Salazar / Dexter Osato vs David Parish / Gene Ching4-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesKurtis Derell / Curtis Kam vs Glenn Yee / Russell Kobayashi6-3, 6-2
2026-07-05vs OC BoomersWon 30
W#1 DoublesAlfred Chow / Gilbert Fernandes vs Greg Cleland / Vatche Martirosian6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKurtis Derell / Michael Hamasu vs Mark Leonard / Bob Pattan6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDexter Osato / Gerald Davis vs David Kula / Lee Conching6-0, 6-3
2026-06-21vs Kaneohe CrewWon 30
W#1 DoublesWilliam Liston / Michael Hamasu vs Glenn Yee / Russell Kobayashi6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCurtis Kam / Kurtis Derell vs Tony Wilson / Gene Ching6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesGary Salazar / Dexter Osato vs Tod Tanaka / Tom Roerk7-5, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 8.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1No Can Run50132695
2Kaneohe Crew3311714120
3OC Boomers0501530181

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.85 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.27
Gerald Davis
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.94
Alfred Chow
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.92
Curtis Kam
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.89
William Liston
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.85
Michael Hamasu
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.76
Gary Au Young
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.75
Kurtis Derell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.40
Dexter Osato
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Gary Salazar
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Gilbert Fernandes
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Lee Couillard
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alfred Chow + Gary Au Young10369% games+7.5% vs expected
Kurtis Derell + Michael Hamasu10557% games+7.4% vs expected
Dexter Osato + Gary Au Young6261% gamesnot enough data
Curtis Kam + Alfred Chow5073% gamesnot enough data
Curtis Kam + Kurtis Derell4161% gamesnot enough data
Gary Au Young + Kurtis Derell4159% gamesnot enough data
Curtis Kam + Dexter Osato303 matchesnot enough data
Curtis Kam + Gilbert Fernandes303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Gerald Davis
66W–46L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
4.27
4
Alfred Chow
53W–35L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
3.94
4
Curtis Kam
26W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.92
4
William Liston
52W–26L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
<1%78%21%
3.89
4
Michael Hamasu
81W–83L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%85%15%
3.85
4
Gary Au Young
75W–37L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.76
4
Kurtis Derell
67W–57L career · 6 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.75
3.5
Dexter Osato
59W–41L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.40
Gary Salazar
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Gilbert Fernandes
50W–33L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lee Couillard
4W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.