Teams

Graybill/18/3.0/M/TCCC

2025 Man · Cov Adult 18 & Over - Men

13 players · average NTRP 2.67 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-05-13Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDavid Drake / Leonard Raymond vs Klint Beckendorf / Yi Xiong6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2025-05-12vs Centanni/Abrams-18/3.0/M/STONELost 01
L#1 SinglesDrew Lindemann vs Nick Bowers6-7, 2-6
2025-05-05vs Gillane/18/3.0/M/STONEWon 10
W#3 DoublesDrew Lindemann / Leonard Raymond vs Zachary Ferger / Ian Krentel2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-03-25Won 10
W#3 DoublesDrew Lindemann / Leonard Raymond vs Karl Schulze / Philip Qualls4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-03-22Lost 01
L#1 SinglesDrew Lindemann vs Mason Sharp2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Cov Adult 18 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.53 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.92
Chris Tusa
usually #3 Doubles 29%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
Chase Bordelon
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.14
Baldwin Barkerding
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published 2.5
Clinton Capdepon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Drew Lindemann
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Evan Graybill
usually #1 Singles 37%, also #1 Doubles 26% · published
Jeffrey Hufft
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published
Justin Clinton
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Kevin Alario
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 23% · published
Leonard Raymond
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Mike Morgan
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published
Nader Shourbaji
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 26% · published
Ross Ledoux
usually #1 Doubles 64%, also #2 Singles 18% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kevin Alario + Justin Clinton0519% gamesnot enough data
Kevin Alario + Mike Morgan134 matchesnot enough data
Baldwin Barkerding + Mike Morgan134 matchesnot enough data
Kevin Alario + Ross Ledoux033 matchesnot enough data
Chris Tusa + Mike Morgan123 matchesnot enough data
Jeffrey Hufft + Mike Morgan033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Chris Tusa
8W–36L career · 26 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
2.92
2.5
Chase Bordelon
0W–5L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Baldwin Barkerding
2W–15L career · 11 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.14
Clinton Capdepon
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Drew Lindemann
8W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Evan Graybill
0W–19L career · 17 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jeffrey Hufft
2W–11L career · 10 lines in 2025
not enough data
Justin Clinton
1W–11L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kevin Alario
1W–22L career · 13 lines in 2025
not enough data
Leonard Raymond
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mike Morgan
5W–22L career · 22 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nader Shourbaji
8W–26L career · 26 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ross Ledoux
5W–16L career · 11 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.