Teams

Kiwi - Raymond

2025 Brevard Adult 18 & Over Early Start · 2.5 Adult Early-Start 18 & Over - Women

7 players · average NTRP 2.50 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-12-19vs RCCB - VickersWon 20
W#1 DoublesTiffany Gragg / Elise Johnson vs Linda Mesnard / Constancia Ford6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJenifer Raymond / Danielle Carlson vs Rima Romanos / Joanne Ringrose6-4, 7-5
2024-12-18vs Fee - TorcuatorSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJenifer Raymond / Danielle Carlson vs Daricca Facciobene / Michelle Dunn1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesHeather Taylor / Tiffany Gragg vs Faith Torcuator / Sandy Cuddeback6-4, 6-4
2024-11-13vs Suntree - RezaSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTiffany Gragg / Heather Taylor vs Maria Reza / Tracy Thomas6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLisa Sexton / Danielle Carlson vs Lisa Allen / Kathryn Nitti4-6, 3-6
2024-11-06vs Fee - TorcuatorWon 21
W#1 DoublesElise Johnson / Heather Taylor vs Brenda Tarquinio / Faith Torcuator6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesMelissa Yanko vs Jenna Bajus6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJenifer Raymond / Anne Burns vs Debra Grayson / Daricca Facciobene1-6, 2-6
2024-10-30vs RCCB - VickersWon 20
W#1 DoublesJenifer Raymond / Tiffany Gragg vs Rima Romanos / Joanne Ringrose6-2, 7-6
W#1 SinglesMelissa Yanko vs Garrett Kuge6-0, 6-1
2024-10-21vs Suntree - RezaWon 30
W#1 DoublesHeather Taylor / Elise Johnson vs JANETTE TABOR / Maria Reza6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesMelissa Yanko vs Chrissy James6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJenifer Raymond / Tiffany Gragg vs Valquiria Zalewski / Lisa Allen4-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Adult Early-Start 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.43 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.56
Melissa Yanko
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.52
Jenifer Raymond
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.52
Heather Taylor
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.49
Danielle Carlson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.32
Lisa Sexton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.18
Anne Burns
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Tiffany Gragg
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Sexton + Anne Burns044 matchesnot enough data
Jenifer Raymond + Danielle Carlson134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Melissa Yanko
8W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
2.56
Jenifer Raymond
17W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%44%56%
2.52
Heather Taylor
11W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
2.52
2.5
Danielle Carlson
12W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%53%47%
2.49
Lisa Sexton
6W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
0%90%10%
2.32
2.5
Anne Burns
9W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
0%99%1%
2.18
Tiffany Gragg
5W–0L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.