Teams

Parrish/Nashville

2025 Adult 40 & Over - Nashville · 3.5 Women - FRI AM

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-04-25vs Baumgartner/Collins/NashvilleLost 04
L#1 DoublesLori Nixon / Leigh Anne Hackett vs Ashley Snipes / Sarah MacIntyre4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesTricia Thornton vs Beth Gottlieb4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesGINA DEEB / Susie Parrish vs Amy Kocian / Ivy Dodson2-6, 2-6
L#4 DoublesLisa Freund / Janet McMeen vs Nicki Robins / Mary Powers3-6, 5-7
2025-03-21vs Baumgartner/Collins/NashvilleLost 14
W#1 DoublesLori Nixon / Jen Weber vs Kathy Wells / Ivy Dodson2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 SinglesTricia Thornton vs Erica Collins1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Jones / Leigh Anne Hackett vs Brandi White / Anjali Lewis4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSusie Parrish / GINA DEEB vs Dina Sjursen / Judith Gallagher5-7, 3-6
L#4 DoublesLisa Freund / Karie Duke vs Carolyn Slandzicki / Beth Patrizio6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women - FRI AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.13
Tricia Thornton
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.11
Jane Ringel
published
3.08
Lisa Freund
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Lori Nixon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Karie Duke
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Susie Parrish
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.82
Leigh Anne Hackett
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.73
Janet McMeen
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.72
GINA DEEB
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.72
Dewanda Carbine
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Freund + Karie Duke044 matchesnot enough data
Susie Parrish + GINA DEEB044 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Freund + Lori Nixon123 matchesnot enough data
Susie Parrish + Leigh Anne Hackett033 matchesnot enough data
Tricia Thornton + Lori Nixon213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tricia Thornton
3W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.13
Jane Ringel
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11
Lisa Freund
5W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.08
Lori Nixon
5W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.06
Karie Duke
1W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
73%27%<1%
2.92
Susie Parrish
1W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
86%14%<1%
2.85
Leigh Anne Hackett
3W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
90%10%<1%
2.82
Janet McMeen
17W–30L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
GINA DEEB
1W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
98%2%<1%
2.72
3
Dewanda Carbine
4W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.