Teams

KY/LEX/Yanik/McGuire

2026 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER LEXINGTON · 2.5 Women (Session 1)

8 players · average NTRP 2.50 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings1 teams · 2.5 Women (Session 1)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KY/LEX/Yanik/McGuire339919141

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.22 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.30
Lindsey Burchett
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.29
Niki Moss
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.26
Elizabeth Yanik
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.26
Anna Marino
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #1 Singles 27% · published 2.5
2.19
Dezirae Shukla
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published 2.5
2.13
Megan Lyons
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.11
Tara Lopez
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Tara Swan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Niki Moss + Anna Marino3253% gamesnot enough data
Elizabeth Yanik + Dezirae Shukla213 matchesnot enough data
Megan Lyons + Tara Lopez213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lindsey Burchett
7W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%93%7%
2.30
Niki Moss
14W–30L career · 9 lines in 2026
0%93%7%
2.29
Elizabeth Yanik
9W–22L career · 8 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.26
2.5
Anna Marino
20W–23L career · 10 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.26
2.5
Dezirae Shukla
4W–10L career · type S · 9 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.19
Megan Lyons
3W–3L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.13
Tara Lopez
6W–3L career · 8 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.11
Tara Swan
1W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.