Teams

BC-LLW-AltaVista/TeresaCampbell

2024 MIXED 55 & OVER I - BC LOCAL LEAGUE · BC - Mixed 55 & Over - 8.0

10 players · average NTRP 4.25 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-03-24Won 10
W#2 DoublesRoselle Paskus / Todd Maeda vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-03-19vs BC-WestEnd/MaryKayDyesWon 10
W#2 DoublesDennis Fernandes / Roselle Paskus vs Todd Arnson / Rebecca Chavira6-4, 6-3
2024-03-16vs BC-AltaVista/GaiOdanakaSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTeresa Campbell / Steven Kigawa vs Michelle Dean / Roche Palileo6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMike Vaughn / Debbie Graves vs John Shure / Evelyn Yanke0-6, 4-6
2024-02-25vs BC-SealBeachTC/EricCamposWon 20
W#2 DoublesDennis Fernandes / Roselle Paskus vs Yolanda Barocio / John Torell1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSteven Kigawa / Karin Chafetz vs Eric Campos / Christy Akin6-3, 6-3
2024-02-10Won 10
W#2 DoublesDennis Fernandes / Roselle Paskus vs Lisa Lee / Mark T Thompson6-0, 6-0
2024-02-03vs BC-AltaVista/GaiOdanakaLost 01
L#1 DoublesMike Vaughn / Debbie Graves vs Michelle Dean / Roche Palileo6-7, 0-6
2024-01-28vs BC-WestEnd/MaryKayDyesSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTeresa Campbell / Steven Kigawa vs Chris Dundas / Yuko Dundas2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesTodd Maeda / Roselle Paskus vs Kenny Lee / Kim Graham4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-01-27vs BC-SealBeachTC/EricCamposWon 10
W#1 DoublesTeresa Campbell / Steven Kigawa vs Randi Young / Mark Mihalco6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for BC - Mixed 55 & Over - 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.07
Roselle Paskus
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Debbie Graves
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.73
Teresa Campbell
published
3.54
Iris Cox
published
Eileen Kaiser
published
Heidi Grimm
published
Israel Mora
published
Karin Chafetz
published
Steven Kigawa
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Suzy Nyhus
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Roselle Paskus
101W–105L career · 5 lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
4.07
4
Debbie Graves
69W–39L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Teresa Campbell
6W–8L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%2%
3.73
Iris Cox
1W–6L career · no lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
3.54
Eileen Kaiser
19W–17L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Heidi Grimm
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Israel Mora
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Karin Chafetz
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Steven Kigawa
76W–50L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Suzy Nyhus
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.