Teams

Midtown/Bill

2026 Broward Adult 18 & Over - Spring Day · 5.0 Men

5 players · average NTRP 5.00 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-07-13Split 11
W#1 DoublesJeff Bill / Todd Schlorf vs Nicholas Baker / Harrison Kennedy6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKenny Torrellas vs Cristian Rubiano2-6, 2-6
2026-05-16vs Broward/RockLost 12
L#1 DoublesJeff Bill / Marcos Daniel Gonzalez vs Luciano Musella / Matthew Rock6-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesEsteban Elias vs Henrique Pereira6-1, 0-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDaniel Schinke / Kenny Torrellas vs Mario Becerra / Thomas Cundy1-6, 3-6
2026-05-09vs FisherIsland/CozzillioLost 12
L#1 DoublesTodd Schlorf / Daniel Schinke vs Paulo Barros / Timothy Taylor3-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesMarcos Daniel Gonzalez vs Kyle Cubela3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJeff Bill / Kenny Torrellas vs Bobby Cozzillio / Herman Ten Have7-6, 6-2
2026-04-25vs Broward/RockLost 03
L#1 DoublesJeff Bill / Esteban Elias vs Mario Becerra / Luciano Musella3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJuan Ribas vs Henrique Pereira1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTodd Schlorf / Kenny Torrellas vs Matthew Rock / Thomas Cundy5-7, 4-6
2026-04-18vs FisherIsland/CozzillioWon 20
W#1 DoublesJeff Bill / Todd Schlorf vs Christopher Cozzillio / Bobby Cozzillio6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesJuan Ribas / Marcos Daniel Gonzalez vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 5.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Broward/Rock5113513128
2FisherIsland/Cozzillio236919154
3Midtown/Bill1451022153

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.56 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.75
Marcos Daniel Gonzalez
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.59
Juan Ribas
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 5
4.52
Todd Schlorf
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
4.37
Kenny Torrellas
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 5
Esteban Elias
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Todd Schlorf + Kenny Torrellas134 matchesnot enough data
Kenny Torrellas + Juan Ribas033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marcos Daniel Gonzalez
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.75
5
Juan Ribas
23W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.59
Todd Schlorf
28W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.52
5
Kenny Torrellas
167W–71L career · 4 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.37
Esteban Elias
3W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.