Teams

Klocek/18s/2.5/PAC Night

2025 Man · Cov Adult 18 & Over - Women Night

14 players · average NTRP 2.60 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-04-22Won 10
W#2 DoublesCameron Cottano / Taylor Roessler vs Paige Butler / Karen Jenkins6-0, 6-0
2025-04-01Split 11
L#1 DoublesLoree Doyle / Chelsea Clement vs Brooke Jenkins / Morgan Dore3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesCameron Cottano vs Michelle Michaelis6-4, 6-3
2025-02-25Lost 02
L#1 DoublesLauren Tagesen / Cameron Cottano vs Rebecca Landry / Diane Matherne2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesAlexis LeBlanc vs Katherine Gristina0-6, 0-6
2025-01-28Split 11
W#1 DoublesCameron Cottano / Elizabeth Klocek vs Lynette Lobell / Melissa Lama6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesAlexis LeBlanc vs Tabitha Lobell0-6, 4-6
2025-01-25Lost 01
L#2 DoublesLoree Doyle / Lauren Tagesen vs Catherine Davenport / Jenny Vitellaro2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Cov Adult 18 & Over - Women Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.49 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.89
Cameron Cottano
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.40
Brittany Hesch
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 2.5
2.33
Chelsea Clement
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.33
Addie Troxclair
usually #1 Singles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Alexis LeBlanc
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 2.5
Elizabeth Klocek
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
Gabrielle Lees
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Jennifer Steen
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Singles 14% · published
Kay Byrd
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Lauren Tagesen
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Loree Doyle
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Taylor Fortune
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Taylor Roessler
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Toria Brown
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Addie Troxclair + Jennifer Steen4164% gamesnot enough data
Chelsea Clement + Elizabeth Klocek213 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Klocek + Kay Byrd033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Cameron Cottano
15W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.89
2.5
Brittany Hesch
6W–8L career · type S · 6 lines in 2025
0%75%25%
2.40
2.5
Chelsea Clement
10W–15L career · 10 lines in 2025
0%89%11%
2.33
2.5
Addie Troxclair
14W–12L career · 9 lines in 2025
0%89%11%
2.33
2.5
Alexis LeBlanc
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Elizabeth Klocek
8W–18L career · 10 lines in 2025
not enough data
Gabrielle Lees
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jennifer Steen
11W–14L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kay Byrd
7W–14L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lauren Tagesen
1W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Loree Doyle
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Taylor Fortune
28W–10L career · 18 lines in 2025
not enough data
Taylor Roessler
7W–2L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Toria Brown
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.