Teams

Escambia - RS/Bonsignore

2021 Escambia Mixed 55 & Over · 7.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.75 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-10-21vs Langan - RS ClayLost 01
L#1 DoublesMary Bryan / Andrew Hillman vs Glenn Langan / Jacqueline Wallace5-7, 6-2, 0-1
2021-10-19vs Langan - RS ClaySplit 11
W#1 DoublesMecy Wimberly / John Wimberly vs Glenn Langan / Vicki Carson7-6, 6-0
L#3 DoublesSusan Bonsignore / Russell Ball vs Richard Andresen / Kelly Dempsey0-6, 0-6
2021-10-14vs Langan - RS ClaySplit 11
L#1 DoublesMecy Wimberly / John Wimberly vs Richard Andresen / Kelly Dempsey3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesSusan Bonsignore / Gerald Day vs Kenneth Wallace / Cindy Andresen6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2021-10-07vs Langan - RS ClayWon 10
W#1 DoublesMecy Wimberly / John Wimberly vs Glenn Langan / Vicki Carson7-5, 6-3
2021-10-01vs Langan - RS ClaySplit 11
W#1 DoublesMecy Wimberly / John Wimberly vs Jacqueline Wallace / Kenneth Wallace6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesSusan Bonsignore / Russell Ball vs Glenn Langan / Vicki Carson6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2021-09-28vs Langan - RS ClaySplit 11
W#2 DoublesSusan Bonsignore / Russell Ball vs Jacqueline Wallace / Kenneth Wallace7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMary Bryan / Gerald Day vs Glenn Langan / Karen Penn2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Gordon Paulus
published 4
3.63
Emily Hillman
published 4
3.26
Celine Hansford
published 3.5
3.24
Mecy Wimberly
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Mary Bryan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.22
Andrew Hillman
published 3.5
3.12
Susan Bonsignore
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
John Wimberly
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Russell Ball
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mecy Wimberly + John Wimberly202250% games−5.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Gordon Paulus
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Emily Hillman
0W–5L career · no lines in 2021
16%83%<1%
3.63
3.5
Celine Hansford
3W–2L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.26
Mecy Wimberly
96W–91L career · 4 lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.24
Mary Bryan
74W–123L career · 2 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Andrew Hillman
10W–12L career · no lines in 2021
5%94%1%
3.22
Susan Bonsignore
98W–94L career · 4 lines in 2021
18%82%<1%
3.12
John Wimberly
123W–97L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Russell Ball
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.