Teams

UTC - Rubio

2025 LEECHARLOTTE Mixed 18 & Over Fall ESL · 7.0 X Saturday

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_7

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-12-07vs Vivante - MadeanWon 10
W#3 DoublesCarmelo Rubio / Nancy Joseph vs Lorraine Heckman Schmidt / David Beier6-1, 6-2
2024-11-23vs Heritage Palms - FrankoWon 10
W#1 DoublesCarmelo Rubio / Beryl Gonzalez vs Shari Franko / Ronald Assise6-2, 6-1
2024-11-09Won 10
W#2 DoublesCarmelo Rubio / Nancy Joseph vs Shane Groth / Susan Deelsnyder6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2024-11-02vs Lake Kennedy - McGirlLost 01
L#2 DoublesCarmelo Rubio / Beryl Gonzalez vs DONNA CLEAVER / Phillip Trammel1-6, 5-7
W#1 DoublesPatricia Sareh / Michal Nawalany vs Wendy Olek / Daniel Kern6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesEmma May / Cody Crivello vs Herman Pardo / Teresa Ganley6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesBeryl Gonzalez / Gary Trewick vs Cathy Demartis / Peter DeMartis6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 X Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Cody Crivello
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
Patricia Sareh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.56
Emma May
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.48
Kenrick Gallander
published
3.44
Raquel Teixeira
published
3.43
Beryl Gonzalez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.28
Lori Summers
published
3.22
Guido Leiendecker
published 3.5
3.10
Elizabeth Gaines
published 3.5
3.05
Gary Trewick
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.91
Carmelo Rubio
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Michal Nawalany
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Robert Proben
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carmelo Rubio + Patricia Sareh213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cody Crivello
4W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Patricia Sareh
26W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%9%91%
3.68
3.5
Emma May
32W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%31%69%
3.56
Kenrick Gallander
14W–21L career · no lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.48
Raquel Teixeira
27W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
Beryl Gonzalez
17W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%71%28%
3.43
Lori Summers
5W–11L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Guido Leiendecker
2W–4L career · type M · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Elizabeth Gaines
7W–7L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.10
3.5
Gary Trewick
5W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.05
3
Carmelo Rubio
254W–234L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.91
Michal Nawalany
15W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Robert Proben
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.