Teams

5-COMBO-Bland-CHTC

2022 Eno River Combo 40 & Over · Eno River 40 & Over Combo 6.5 Men Evening

9 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-10-04Won 10
W#1 DoublesDavid Gilliam / Gary Glish vs Kyle Jackson / Chris Lee6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-09-27vs 2-DNaden-HSWon 20
W#1 DoublesDavid Gilliam / Gary Glish vs Jeff Denhard / Jeffrey Szafran6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCarmelo Cataudella / Donovan Khamphasong vs David Naden / Dave Thomas6-1, 6-1
2022-09-20vs 3-RLong--CCC-40 6.5Won 20
W#1 DoublesGary Glish / Carmelo Cataudella vs Christopher LeGrand / David Schumann6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDonovan Khamphasong / Jay Bauer vs Travis Angle / Stephen Arrowood7-5, 6-4
2022-09-18vs 1-CLee-HSWon 10
W#2 DoublesDonovan Khamphasong / Mark Bland vs Chris Lee / Dirk Kumashiro6-1, 6-4
2022-09-13vs 4-AYoung-EV-6.5-Combo-40+Won 10
W#2 DoublesDonovan Khamphasong / Jay Bauer vs Carl Laird / Marvin Davis6-1, 7-6
2022-08-23vs 2-DNaden-HSWon 10
W#1 DoublesGary Glish / David Gilliam vs Mark Macdonald / Scott Hartman7-5, 6-2
2022-08-16vs 3-RLong--CCC-40 6.5Split 11
W#1 DoublesGary Glish / David Gilliam vs JAMES MONTAGUE / Arash Chehrazi6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDonovan Khamphasong / Mark Bland vs John McCallie / David Schumann4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Eno River 40 & Over Combo 6.5 Men Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Gary Glish
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Donovan Khamphasong
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.13
Kurt Rosenkrantz
published
2.92
Robert Kern
published
2.89
Mark Bland
published
2.86
Mitch Kleiman
published
2.77
David Gilliam
published
Mark Thomsen
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Gary Glish
141W–124L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.30
3.5
Donovan Khamphasong
54W–68L career · 5 lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
Kurt Rosenkrantz
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
3.13
Robert Kern
1W–10L career · no lines in 2022
74%26%<1%
2.92
Mark Bland
16W–20L career · no lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
2.89
Mitch Kleiman
15W–35L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
2.86
3
Carmelo Cataudella
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
David Gilliam
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mark Thomsen
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.