Teams

LTF LEIKER/TAYLOR

2025 FW USTA Winter Social 18+ Ladies - N · A

8 players · average NTRP 2.83 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-02-14vs RID SELKINGWon 21
L#1 DoublesAmanda Conroy / Mary Berg vs MEREDITH CODY / Melinda Delk1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesKiera Mathis vs Megan Quirk6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMolly Leiker / Holly Coker vs Ashley Healey / Lauren Selking6-4, 6-3
2025-01-31vs RID DIAZWon 30
W#1 DoublesJessica Sargent / Mary Berg vs Katy Page / Kat Scheurer6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesMolly Leiker vs Robin Edwards1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAshley Herndon / Holly Coker vs Rachel Payne / Cailey Walton6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-01-28vs RID SELKINGSplit 11
L#1 SinglesIrene Hatfield vs MEREDITH CODY0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKiera Mathis / Ashley Herndon vs Ashley Davis / Whitney Perry6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for A have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.88
Kiera Mathis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.81
Courtni Felker
published 3
2.75
Jessica Sargent
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.69
Charla Lee
published 2.5
2.66
Molly Leiker
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.65
Amanda Conroy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.57
Irene Hatfield
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.52
Holly Coker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Molly Leiker + Courtni Felker123 matchesnot enough data
Courtni Felker + Charla Lee213 matchesnot enough data
Jessica Sargent + Charla Lee213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kiera Mathis
17W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
2.88
3
Courtni Felker
11W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%8%
2.81
Jessica Sargent
14W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
2.5
Charla Lee
6W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2025
0%9%91%
2.69
Molly Leiker
14W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
2.66
3
Amanda Conroy
9W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
14%85%1%
2.65
Irene Hatfield
2W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
32%68%<1%
2.57
Holly Coker
3W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
2.52

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.