Teams

Bordelon/18/6.5/Combo/Red's/LFT

2025 LAF Southern Combo 18 & Over - Men · 6.5 Laf (18&O) Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.17 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-09vs Barras/18/6.5/Combo/CCRR/LFTWon 20
W#1 DoublesPhillip Edmond / Jeffrey Peatross vs Mickal McMath / Scott Higgins6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesLandon Vidrine / Ryan Bordelon vs Jon Decuir / Aaron Hebert6-4, 6-2
2025-10-02vs Wiggin/18/6.5/Combo/OCC/LFTLost 02
L#1 DoublesPhillip Edmond / Jeffrey Peatross vs Thomas Hesse / Jake Marler0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRyan Bordelon / Brent Hebert vs Randal Dupuy / Matthew Copeskey0-6, 4-6
2025-09-25vs Credeur/18/6.5/Combo/YSC/LFTLost 12
L#1 DoublesClint Simoneaux / Brandon Bradley vs Cole Richoux / Daniel Maldonado4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesPhillip Edmond / Jeffrey Peatross vs John Courrege / Zachary Smith6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLandon Vidrine / Brent Hebert vs Ryan Mayet / Alexander Hunt6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-09-18vs Mackensen/18/6.5/Combo/BVR/LFTWon 21
L#1 DoublesPhillip Edmond / Naveen Kallepalli vs Flavien Missier / Jerad Hayes6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesThomas Quinn / Ryan Bordelon vs Nicholas Ousse / Nathan Hong4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLandon Vidrine / Brent Hebert vs Brad Parfait / Corneilous Craig6-0, 6-1
2025-09-04vs Barras/18/6.5/Combo/CCRR/LFTLost 02
L#2 DoublesJosh Wheeler / Brent Hebert vs Mickal McMath / Aaron Hebert2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJarrod Richoux / Jeffrey Peatross vs Ting Jiang / Robert Powell6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2025-08-28vs Wiggin/18/6.5/Combo/OCC/LFTWon 21
W#1 DoublesLandon Vidrine / Brent Hebert vs Lance Crappell / Bill McDermott6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesPhillip Edmond / Jeffrey Peatross vs Cameron Wiggins / JJ Wiggins6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesClint Simoneaux / Naveen Kallepalli vs David Schexnayder / Steven Ashy1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-08-21vs Credeur/18/6.5/Combo/YSC/LFTLost 12
L#1 DoublesThomas Quinn / Brandon Bradley vs Daniel Maldonado / Cole Richoux4-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesJosh Wheeler / John Bui vs Will Stevenson / Shawn McNeil7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJarrod Richoux / Ryan Bordelon vs Richard Cormier / Zachary Smith1-6, 1-6
2025-08-14vs Mackensen/18/6.5/Combo/BVR/LFTWon 30
W#1 DoublesPhillip Edmond / Brent Hebert vs RAJESH SUBRAMANI / Til MacKensen6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesClint Simoneaux / Naveen Kallepalli vs Nathan Hong / Jerad Hayes6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLandon Vidrine / Jeffrey Peatross vs Flavien Missier / Brad Parfait6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Laf (18&O) Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Phillip Edmond
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published
3.35
Jarrod Richoux
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.25
Naveen Kallepalli
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.24
Clint Simoneaux
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.08
Josh Wheeler
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.93
Ryan Bordelon
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
2.89
Brandon Bradley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.86
Jeffrey Peatross
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.74
Brent Hebert
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Landon Vidrine
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeffrey Peatross + Brent Hebert5450% games+0.8% vs expected
Ryan Bordelon + Brent Hebert1436% gamesnot enough data
Ryan Bordelon + Jeffrey Peatross134 matchesnot enough data
Clint Simoneaux + Jarrod Richoux314 matchesnot enough data
Phillip Edmond + Jeffrey Peatross314 matchesnot enough data
Brent Hebert + Landon Vidrine213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Phillip Edmond
34W–20L career · 11 lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.47
Jarrod Richoux
42W–21L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%86%14%
3.35
Naveen Kallepalli
17W–27L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Clint Simoneaux
11W–16L career · 8 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.24
Josh Wheeler
1W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
3.08
Ryan Bordelon
18W–25L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Brandon Bradley
6W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.89
Jeffrey Peatross
20W–14L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
2.86
3
Brent Hebert
14W–16L career · 6 lines in 2025
4%92%3%
2.74
Landon Vidrine
4W–3L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.