Teams

WI Adult 65&O 7.0W MALT Herbert

2026 WI Adult 65 & Over · WI Adult 65 & Over 7.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.17 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-23vs WI Adult 65&O 7.0W MALT RieschSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMarilyn Herbert / Kimberlie Laderriere vs Paula Riesch / Kathleen Sherman3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesBonnie Law / Jan Westemeier vs Donna Neuber / Jill Bradshaw6-3, 6-3
2026-07-16vs WI Adult 65&O 7.0W MALT RieschWon 21
W#1 DoublesJan Westemeier / Carole Carroll vs Carolyn Layton / Debbie Weisbrod6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAnn Camillo / Kimberlie Laderriere vs Donna Neuber / Paula Riesch7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJanet Homburg / Bonnie Law vs Jill Bradshaw / Barbara Johnson6-3, 7-6
2026-07-09vs WI Adult 65&O 7.0W MALT RieschWon 30
W#1 DoublesCarole Carroll / Marilyn Herbert vs Kathryn Leide / Donna McCarthy-Beckett6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesAnn Camillo / Jan Westemeier vs Debbie Weisbrod / Carolyn Layton6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKimberlie Laderriere / Bonnie Law vs Paula Riesch / Barbara Johnson4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-06-25vs WI Adult 65&O 7.0W MALT RieschLost 12
L#1 DoublesAnn Camillo / Kimberlie Laderriere vs Paula Riesch / Debbie Weisbrod1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMarilyn Herbert / Janet Homburg vs Donna McCarthy-Beckett / Kathleen Sherman2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJan Westemeier / Carole Carroll vs Jill Bradshaw / Donna Neuber6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2026-06-24vs WI Adult 65&O 7.0W MALT RieschWon 21
L#1 DoublesJan Westemeier / Marilyn Herbert vs Kathleen Sherman / Donna McCarthy-Beckett1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJanet Homburg / Kimberlie Laderriere vs Paula Riesch / Barbara Johnson1-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCarole Carroll / Ann Camillo vs Kathryn Leide / Carolyn Layton6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2026-06-19vs WI Adult 65&O 7.0W MALT RieschWon 21
W#1 DoublesKimberlie Laderriere / Jan Westemeier vs Debbie Weisbrod / Kathleen Sherman6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAnn Camillo / Carole Carroll vs Donna McCarthy-Beckett / Kathryn Leide6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesMarilyn Herbert / Janet Homburg vs Paula Riesch / Barbara Johnson1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · WI Adult 65 & Over 7.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WI Adult 65&O 7.0W MALT Herbert4211721183
2WI Adult 65&O 7.0W MALT Riesch2471124161

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
Carole Carroll
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.02
Bonnie Law
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.84
Ann Camillo
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
Jan Westemeier
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Janet Homburg
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Kimberlie Laderriere
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Marilyn Herbert
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carole Carroll + Ann Camillo5059% gamesnot enough data
Marilyn Herbert + Ann Camillo033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carole Carroll
8W–0L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
3.26
3
Bonnie Law
28W–31L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
3.02
3
Ann Camillo
36W–36L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%89%11%
2.84
Jan Westemeier
33W–37L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Janet Homburg
8W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kimberlie Laderriere
6W–5L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Marilyn Herbert
27W–36L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.