Teams

MLewis (Park Crossing)

2023 Adult 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Adult 5.0 Women - Sat PM

8 players · average NTRP 4.62 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-05-20vs JAlexander (Park Road Park)Won 10
W#1 DoublesNatalie Osman / Samantha Danesis vs Brittney Desmond / Lindsey Stuckey6-2, 0-6, 1-0
2023-05-06Won 20
W#1 SinglesSunny Bowers vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSamantha Danesis / Elizabeth Schrand vs Jaclyn Rock / Meredith Propeck6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2023-04-29vs JAlexander (Park Road Park)Won 20
W#1 DoublesSunny Bowers / Lela Thompson vs Lindsey Stuckey / Juliana Marques2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesSamantha Danesis vs Jennifer Anderson6-2, 7-5
2023-03-30vs JAlexander (Park Road Park)Won 10
W#1 SinglesSamantha Danesis vs Callie Schmit6-2, 6-1
2023-03-18vs DWest (Park Road)Split 11
W#1 DoublesSamantha Danesis / Natalie Osman vs Meredith Propeck / Melissa Skovira6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMichelle Alexander Hovey / Elizabeth Schrand vs Kindell Schmitt / Jaclyn Rock4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-03-11vs JAlexander (Park Road Park)Split 11
L#1 DoublesMAGDALENA STUDENOVSKY / Natalie Osman vs Brittney Desmond / Sara Thompson3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesSamantha Danesis vs Savanna Dumit4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-03-09vs DWest (Park Road)Split 11
W#1 DoublesNatalie Osman / Samantha Danesis vs Kindell Schmitt / Jennifer Holshouser7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMAGDALENA STUDENOVSKY / Melanie Lewis vs Diana West / Jaclyn Rock7-6, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 5.0 Women - Sat PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.39 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.56
Samantha Danesis
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 43% · published 5
4.45
Sunny Bowers
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
4.40
MAGDALENA STUDENOVSKY
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.38
Elizabeth Schrand
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.30
Stacy Agar
published 4.5
4.25
Melanie Lewis
published
Lela Thompson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sunny Bowers + Samantha Danesis224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Samantha Danesis
110W–53L career · 7 lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.56
Sunny Bowers
50W–25L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%63%37%
4.45
4.5
MAGDALENA STUDENOVSKY
45W–31L career · type A · 2 lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
4.40
4.5
Elizabeth Schrand
52W–26L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%79%20%
4.38
4.5
Stacy Agar
76W–48L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
4.30
Melanie Lewis
9W–1L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
4.25
Lela Thompson
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Michelle Alexander Hovey
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.