Teams

SUMMERLIN ARBORS #2

2025 NTA ADULT FALL LEAGUE · 2.5 WOMEN

7 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NEVADA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2025-12-10vs SPANISH OAKSLost 12
W#1 DoublesKayla Barton / Cassidy De La Mare vs Sharon Edwards / Blythe Mancini6-4, 6-1
L#1 SinglesLauren Tabeek vs Yusria Malik2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJocelyn Herman / Vivienne Osmena vs Tiffany Rorman / Nancy Myster7-6, 6-7, 0-1
2025-12-03vs SUMMERLIN ARBORS #1Lost 03
L#1 DoublesCassidy De La Mare / Kayla Barton vs Genesis Garcia / Renee Johnson2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesJessica Marx vs Ani Zargaryan6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesVivienne Osmena / Lauren Tabeek vs Lynda Valenzuela / Marianik Giffard5-7, 2-6
2025-11-12vs SPANISH TRAILLost 02
L#1 DoublesJocelyn Herman / Madeleine Navar vs Sarah Bolor / Azucena Benito6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKayla Barton vs Danielle Pokroy0-6, 1-6
2025-11-12vs DTC #2Split 11
L#1 DoublesJessica Marx / Lauren Tabeek vs Megan Johnson / Lexi Fleury7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCassidy De La Mare / Madeleine Navar vs Kristen Donadio / Haley Ramous6-2, 6-4
2025-11-05vs DTC #1Lost 12
L#1 DoublesJessica Marx / Kayla Barton vs Elena MacHurek / Tiffany Vance7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMadeleine Navar vs Maria de Lourdes Herrera3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJocelyn Herman / Zhanna Clark vs Cari Jones / Paola Docter6-4, 6-1
2025-10-29vs TPCWon 21
L#1 DoublesMadeleine Navar / Lauren Tabeek vs Melissa Puopolo / Katrina Braman0-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesJessica Marx vs Dulcinea Rongavilla6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKayla Barton / Jocelyn Herman vs Chelsey Queeley / Nicole Solovey6-3, 6-2
2025-10-22vs STIRLING CLUBSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJessica Marx / Vivienne Osmena vs Arlene Joyner-Tucker / Jill Dale7-5, 6-1
L#1 SinglesCassidy De La Mare vs Julie Ylarde6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2025-10-15vs ALL AMERICAN TENNIS CENTERLost 12
W#1 DoublesJocelyn Herman / Cassidy De La Mare vs Janel Mcdonald / Cherinne Gryn3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJessica Marx vs Trinity Marie Savanapridi6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMadeleine Navar / Vivienne Osmena vs Danika Johnson / Jelena Petrovic1-6, 1-6
2025-10-08vs DTC #3Lost 12
L#1 DoublesCassidy De La Mare / Lauren Tabeek vs Eryn Weed / Cecilia Reynolds1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesKayla Barton vs Debra Kelleher2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesMadeleine Navar / Jocelyn Herman vs Lydia Gebrai / Charlotte Durisseau6-1, 6-2
2025-10-01vs SPANISH OAKSWon 21
L#1 DoublesLauren Tabeek / Vivienne Osmena vs Elizabeth Templeton / Blythe Mancini3-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesJessica Marx vs Leah Martin6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJocelyn Herman / Cassidy De La Mare vs Lily Ward / Amy Meyer6-3, 6-1
2025-09-24vs SUMMERLIN ARBORS #1Lost 03
L#1 DoublesCassidy De La Mare / Jessica Marx vs Brittany Carlson / Genesis Garcia6-7, 4-6
L#1 SinglesKayla Barton vs Ani Zargaryan1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJocelyn Herman / Lauren Tabeek vs Renee Johnson / Lynda Valenzuela1-6, 4-6
2025-09-17vs SPANISH TRAILWon 21
W#1 DoublesCassidy De La Mare / Kayla Barton vs Sarah Bolor / Winna Pham2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJessica Marx vs Lora Saginoff7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMadeleine Navar / Vivienne Osmena vs Danielle Pokroy / Rosemarie Caspary0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.24 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.70
Jessica Marx
usually #1 Singles 56%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published
2.54
Jocelyn Herman
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.23
Cassidy De La Mare
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 2.5
2.13
Kayla Barton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 38% · published
2.09
Madeleine Navar
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
2.01
Vivienne Osmena
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
1.97
Lauren Tabeek
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kayla Barton + Cassidy De La Mare2341% games−8.8% vs expected
Jocelyn Herman + Cassidy De La Mare404 matchesnot enough data
Lauren Tabeek + Madeleine Navar123 matchesnot enough data
Lauren Tabeek + Vivienne Osmena033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jessica Marx
8W–6L career · 9 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
2.70
Jocelyn Herman
26W–16L career · 15 lines in 2025
0%37%63%
2.54
2.5
Cassidy De La Mare
8W–10L career · 9 lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.23
Kayla Barton
7W–9L career · 8 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.13
Madeleine Navar
6W–9L career · 7 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.09
Vivienne Osmena
2W–9L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.01
Lauren Tabeek
5W–22L career · 7 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.97

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.