Teams

Titus/LR/Reb

2025 Mixed 18 & Over 3.0, 4.0, 10.0 · 3.0 Mixed

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-07-17vs Smouni/LR/PVCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesLanie Driver / Mason Shidler vs William Kalkbrenner / Devon Kalkbrenner7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesBlake Titus / Morgan Doughty vs Tyler Bozynski / Rayni Bozynski6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRaegan Hickam / Bennett Perkins vs Hatim Smouni / Abby Adkins1-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-07-15vs Rutledge/Allison/LR/RebWon 21
W#1 DoublesMorgan Doughty / Payton Titus vs Harsha Dondamury / Susan Allison7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMason Shidler / Maggie Emerson vs Aleksandr Krakhalev / Wendie Weare6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAshley Blair Simpson / Preston Simpson vs Jillian Wilson / Paul Swann7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2025-07-09vs Griffin/LR/RebWon 21
W#1 DoublesBrandon Perkins / Lanie Driver vs Jess Griffin / Roz Taylor6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesPayton Titus / Maggie Emerson vs Hunter Bowen / Yan Sun3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesBennett Perkins / Raegan Hickam vs Eric Elizondo / Rachel Stevens6-1, 6-3
2025-06-26vs Shaddock/LR/RebLost 12
W#1 DoublesLanie Driver / Mason Shidler vs Jaclyn Bracey / Paul Hruby7-5, 5-4
L#2 DoublesMorgan Doughty / Payton Titus vs Regina Maher / Joshua Gaines0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAshley Blair Simpson / Preston Simpson vs Lacey Watts / Carter Morris3-6, 4-6
2025-06-24vs Harkins/LR/RebWon 21
L#1 DoublesMaggie Emerson / Bennett Perkins vs Lindsey Wittenberg / Justin Wittenberg1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLanie Driver / Blake Titus vs James Harkins / Amy Harkins7-5, 4-2
W#3 DoublesBrandon Perkins / Raegan Hickam vs Christopher Baehr / Erin Cosse6-1, 6-1
2025-06-18vs Robinson/Benton/RebWon 21
L#1 DoublesAshley Blair Simpson / Preston Simpson vs Melissa Buck / Brice Sisco6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMorgan Doughty / Payton Titus vs Joshua de la Cruz / Whitney Garner7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMason Shidler / Raegan Hickam vs Emily Robinson / Andrew Kincaid4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-06-10vs Webster/Conway/BPLost 03
L#1 DoublesLanie Driver / Mason Shidler vs Collin Cahill / Molly Scott3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBlake Titus / Ashley Blair Simpson vs JB Hopkins / Bethany Downs1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRaegan Hickam / Brandon Perkins vs Amy Ross / Michael Laureano4-6, 2-6
2025-06-02vs Clark/LR/RebLost 12
L#1 DoublesPayton Titus / Lanie Driver vs Donald Deaton / Kaitlyn Witherell2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMason Shidler / Raegan Hickam vs Don Dobbins / Jennifer Dartez6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesPreston Simpson / Ashley Blair Simpson vs Linh Le / Christa Clark6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Laura Titus
published
3.07
Lanie Driver
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
2.98
Payton Titus
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.94
Morgan Doughty
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.90
Ashley Blair Simpson
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.88
Raegan Hickam
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
2.79
Brandon Perkins
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Bennett Perkins
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.75
Blake Titus
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Maggie Emerson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Mason Shidler
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Preston Simpson
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Payton Titus + Morgan Doughty6259% games+5.6% vs expected
Ashley Blair Simpson + Preston Simpson134 matchesnot enough data
Payton Titus + Lanie Driver213 matchesnot enough data
Brandon Perkins + Raegan Hickam213 matchesnot enough data
Blake Titus + Morgan Doughty303 matchesnot enough data
Lanie Driver + Mason Shidler213 matchesnot enough data
Mason Shidler + Raegan Hickam213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laura Titus
27W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.46
Lanie Driver
40W–9L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%31%69%
3.07
Payton Titus
21W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
2.98
Morgan Doughty
20W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Ashley Blair Simpson
11W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.90
Raegan Hickam
9W–6L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
Brandon Perkins
5W–1L career · type S · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Bennett Perkins
1W–2L career · type M · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Blake Titus
10W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.75
Maggie Emerson
2W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mason Shidler
5W–2L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Preston Simpson
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.