Teams

OC Monarch Beach - Tom - Sun

2024 OC 55 & Over Mixed Doubles · OC WE 8.0

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-11-17vs OC Seal Beach - Kathy - Sun1Won 20
W#2 DoublesTommy Cramer / Eileen MacKenzie vs Brenda Danielson / Bryan Nguyen6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRegina Jacobs / Jeffrey Smith vs David Jernigan / Gamble Yeung6-4, 7-5
2024-11-10vs OC Aces Wild - Seal Beach - Sat11Won 30
W#1 DoublesEileen MacKenzie / Tommy Cramer vs Yolanda Barocio / Ling Wong7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKelly Kehlet / Jeffrey Smith vs Dean Kitano / Tricia Bregman6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMichael Friedland / Regina Jacobs vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-11-02vs SoCal/Tran/Mxd55&Over8.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesBill Sieck / Kelly Kehlet vs Dave Ferree / Tai Sisson6-3, 6-0
2024-10-27vs OC Coto De Caza - Chat Sun10Split 11
L#1 DoublesKelly Kehlet / Michael Friedland vs Pratap Leonard / Tammy Hyland3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesEileen MacKenzie / Tommy Cramer vs Rebecca Brown / Edward Pederson6-4, 7-6
2024-10-13vs OC Seal Beach - Kathy - Sun1Split 11
W#1 DoublesBill Sieck / Regina Jacobs vs Ben Phan / Giao Do6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesEileen MacKenzie / Brian Richardson vs Kathy Zepeda Emerzian / Loc NGUYEN2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2024-10-06vs OC Aces Wild - Seal Beach - Sat11Lost 01
L#3 DoublesBill Sieck / Kelly Kehlet vs Jon Peabody / Cheryl Gates3-6, 5-7
2024-09-29vs SoCal/Tran/Mxd55&Over8.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesTommy Cramer / Eileen MacKenzie vs Frank Tran / Allison Lloyd6-1, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC WE 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Kathleen Gustafson
published
4.00
Eileen MacKenzie
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
3.97
Brian Richardson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.96
Bill Sieck
published 4
3.88
Kelly Kehlet
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.77
Amy Berk
published 4
3.72
Tommy Cramer
published
3.60
Regina Jacobs
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.52
Kent Burner
published
Afsaneh Taghavi
published 3.5
3.03
David Berk
published 3.5
Stephen Vangelos
published
Sumant Nagarkar
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathleen Gustafson
11W–9L career · no lines in 2024
49%51%<1%
4.00
4.5
Eileen MacKenzie
86W–29L career · 5 lines in 2024
50%50%<1%
4.00
4.5
Brian Richardson
8W–7L career · 1 line in 2024
59%41%<1%
3.97
4
Bill Sieck
4W–5L career · type A · no lines in 2024
<1%61%39%
3.96
4
Kelly Kehlet
62W–36L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
3.88
4
Amy Berk
6W–11L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
Tommy Cramer
5W–12L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Regina Jacobs
71W–32L career · 3 lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
3.60
Kent Burner
5W–0L career · no lines in 2024
<1%46%54%
3.52
3.5
Afsaneh Taghavi
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
David Berk
2W–9L career · no lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
3.03
Stephen Vangelos
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sumant Nagarkar
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.