Teams

Lost Forest - Buzzsaws

*2026 Houston Fall League (2025) NA - Monday Men's Singles · 3.0 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-11-10vs Lost Forest - LumberjacksLost 03
L#2 SinglesMichael Whelen vs Jack Sheahan5-7, 3-6
L#3 SinglesJoe Dowell vs Jack Vogelgesang1-6, 1-6
L#4 SinglesDavid Jin vs David Christensen1-6, 1-6
2025-11-03vs Lost Forest - LumberjacksWon 20
W#3 SinglesChirag Amin vs Chris Keen6-3, 6-0
W#4 SinglesMaylon Atchison vs Josh Freedkin6-3, 6-0
2025-10-27vs Lost Forest - LumberjacksLost 12
W#2 SinglesChirag Amin vs Josh Freedkin6-3, 6-0
L#3 SinglesDavid Jin vs David Christensen3-6, 1-6
L#4 SinglesJoe Dowell vs CHARLES HILDEBRAND3-6, 2-6
2025-10-20vs Lost Forest - LumberjacksLost 12
W#2 SinglesMichael Whelen vs David Christensen6-0, 6-0
L#3 SinglesDavid Jin vs Chris Keen3-6, 4-6
L#4 SinglesMaylon Atchison vs Jack Vogelgesang2-6, 2-6
2025-10-13vs Lost Forest - LumberjacksWon 21
W#2 SinglesKevin Guan vs David Christensen6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesJoe Dowell vs Josh Freedkin6-2, 7-5
L#4 SinglesMaylon Atchison vs Jack Sheahan1-6, 2-6
2025-10-06vs Lost Forest - LumberjacksLost 01
L#4 SinglesMaylon Atchison vs Josh Freedkin5-7, 3-6
2025-09-29vs Lost Forest - LumberjacksLost 13
L#1 SinglesKevin Guan vs CHARLES HILDEBRAND4-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesJoe Dowell vs Christopher Prescott4-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesChirag Amin vs Chris Keen6-0, 6-2
L#4 SinglesDavid Jin vs Josh Freedkin1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.08
Chirag Amin
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.88
Michael Whelen
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.70
Joe Dowell
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
2.63
Kevin Guan
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.52
Maylon Atchison
usually #4 Singles 100% · published
2.50
David Jin
usually #4 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3
Eric Guerrero
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maylon Atchison + Joe Dowell033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Chirag Amin
14W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%29%71%
3.08
Michael Whelen
9W–38L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.88
Joe Dowell
4W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
2.70
Kevin Guan
2W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
18%81%<1%
2.63
Maylon Atchison
1W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
2.52
3
David Jin
4W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
2.50
Eric Guerrero
4W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.