Teams

Sisoukrath/Benton/Rebs

2025 Combo 40 & Over 6.5, 8.5 · 6.5 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.25 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-09-24vs Bennett/Worley/LR/RebsWon 21
L#1 DoublesRyan Oyos / Grant Morshedi vs Jason Bennett / Max Good2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesNathan Bender / Ryan Allmond vs Paul Kroger / Stan Belue3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCharlie Roberts / Brian Harrison vs Christopher Irons / Pete Owens6-1, 6-2
2025-09-08vs DGarretson/LR/RebWon 21
W#1 DoublesRyan Oyos / Ryan Allmond vs Benjamin Rider / Dustin Davis7-6, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKirk Grynwald / Mike Terrell vs Pete Tanguay / Shreyas Govardhan7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesNathan Bender / Michael Brooks vs Hitesh Patel / Dallas Stevens6-4, 6-4
2025-08-27vs Bennett/Worley/LR/RebsLost 12
L#1 DoublesBryan Turriff / Michael Castens vs Max Good / Roger Weldon1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesCharlie Roberts / Brian Harrison vs Dean Worley / Bobby Perry7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTay Sisoukrath / Sean Massey vs Michael Shepherd / Stan Belue3-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Ryan Allmond
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.37
Nathan Bender
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.36
Michael Castens
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Ryan Oyos
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Kirk Grynwald
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Charlie Roberts
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.09
Bryan Turriff
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.04
Tay Sisoukrath
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.95
Sean Massey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Mike Terrell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
Grant Morshedi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ryan Allmond
28W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.47
Nathan Bender
5W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
82%18%<1%
3.37
Michael Castens
18W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.36
Ryan Oyos
21W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.31
Kirk Grynwald
34W–33L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Charlie Roberts
28W–20L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
3
Bryan Turriff
9W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%26%74%
3.09
Tay Sisoukrath
15W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.04
Sean Massey
30W–26L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%63%37%
2.95
Mike Terrell
7W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%65%35%
2.94
Grant Morshedi
21W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%77%22%
2.89

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.