Teams

Eccles-Topeka

2025 KS 40 & Over Adult Indoor League · 3.5 Women

20 players · average NTRP 3.44 / KANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-05-04vs KS/Rothwell/Teal/40&Over3.5WLost 13
W#1 DoublesMichelle Robinson / Francis Katzer vs Jesica Rothwell / Danielle Hoover7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAli Wilson vs Mica Elkouri4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMegan Bergquist / Susan Palmer vs Jaclyn Reilly / Allyson Teal6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDebbie Flynn / Andrea Holland vs Gina Cole / Denise Delcore1-6, 4-6
2025-05-04vs KS/Rothwell/Teal/40&Over3.5WLost 13
W#1 DoublesMichelle Robinson / Francis Katzer vs Allyson Teal / Gina Cole2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAli Wilson vs Mica Elkouri1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCathy Rinehart / Candace Herman vs Danielle Hoover / Jaclyn Reilly3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesMegan Bergquist / Nicole Hutton vs Jesica Rothwell / Denise Delcore1-6, 3-6
2025-04-27vs White-GenesisWon 31
W#1 DoublesMichelle Robinson / Francis Katzer vs Amanda Moreira / Nallely Romo-Neuray6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesElizabeth Herman vs Lisa Cole6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesCathy Rinehart / Candace Herman vs Peggy Powell / Randi Kay Graham3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesAli Wilson / Nicole Hutton vs Brenda Munds / Katherine Kryzer6-4, 6-5
2025-04-27vs White-GenesisWon 40
W#1 DoublesCathy Rinehart / Candace Herman vs Peggy Powell / Katherine Kryzer6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesAli Wilson vs Amanda Moreira7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMichelle Robinson / Francis Katzer vs Brenda Munds / Randi Kay Graham6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAndrea Holland / Nicole Hutton vs Cheryl Brock / Lisa Cole6-1, 6-2
2025-04-13vs Double Shots-GenesisWon 30
W#1 DoublesRelyn Strom / Michelle Robinson vs Lily Fang-Yen / Cynthia Pfeiffer6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesAli Wilson vs Erica Combs6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDebbie Flynn / Susan Palmer vs Kym Ratcliffe / Paula Bette6-2, 6-3
2025-04-13vs Double Shots-GenesisWon 30
W#1 DoublesAli Wilson / Susan Palmer vs Lily Fang-Yen / Cynthia Pfeiffer6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesRelyn Strom vs Kym Ratcliffe6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDebra Schwarz / Karli Alderson vs Erica Combs / Paula Bette6-2, 7-5
2025-04-06vs KSWC/Harris/Swindler/40&Over3.5WSplit 22
W#1 DoublesCathy Rinehart / Candace Herman vs Starburst Murphy / DENISE OBR6-2, 7-6
L#1 SinglesDanielle Kruse vs Angela Vetter1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKarli Alderson / Megan Bergquist vs Sandy Wegner / Kelsey Baker1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesMichelle Robinson / Kareem Thomas vs Sara Streich / Janet Clopine7-5, 7-5
2025-04-06vs KSWC/Harris/Swindler/40&Over3.5WLost 13
L#1 DoublesMegan Bergquist / Danielle Kruse vs Sandy Wegner / Angela Vetter3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesKareem Thomas vs Lea Ann Mcilvain0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKarli Alderson / Michelle Robinson vs Kelsey Baker / DENISE OBR6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesCathy Rinehart / Candace Herman vs Katie Hund / Valerie Cowan2-6, 2-6
2025-03-30vs Peck-SalinaWon 30
W#1 DoublesAli Wilson / Susan Palmer vs Michelle Peck / Deby Vidricksen7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAmanda Poole / Liz Klausman vs Shelly Power / Shelley Schroeder6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDebbie Flynn / Laura Leinwetter vs Kate Bycroft / Callie Rost6-1, 6-3
2025-03-30vs Peck-SalinaWon 21
L#1 DoublesDebra Schwarz / Danielle Kruse vs Michelle Peck / Deby Vidricksen4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLaura Leinwetter / Amanda Poole vs Shelly Power / Shelley Schroeder6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDebbie Flynn / Liz Klausman vs Kate Bycroft / Callie Rost6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Elizabeth Herman
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.32
Debbie Flynn
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.31
Ali Wilson
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.31
Relyn Strom
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Amanda Poole
published 3.5
Andrea Holland
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Debra Schwarz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.18
Candace Herman
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.13
Megan Bergquist
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.10
Susan Palmer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.10
Francis Katzer
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.03
Cathy Rinehart
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.01
Kareem Thomas
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.85
Liz Klausman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.82
Don Eccles
published
2.62
Danielle Kruse
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
Karli Alderson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Laura Leinwetter
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Michelle Robinson
published
Nicole Hutton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Candace Herman + Debbie Flynn9462% games+6.0% vs expected
Danielle Kruse + Kareem Thomas2648% games+5.6% vs expected
Candace Herman + Cathy Rinehart221952% games+3.7% vs expected
Cathy Rinehart + Megan Bergquist5167% games+1.3% vs expected
Cathy Rinehart + Debbie Flynn6264% games−1.2% vs expected
Ali Wilson + Megan Bergquist151150% games−1.4% vs expected
Liz Klausman + Francis Katzer3645% games−3.4% vs expected
Debra Schwarz + Cathy Rinehart2449% games−9.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Elizabeth Herman
37W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Debbie Flynn
45W–35L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Ali Wilson
135W–116L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.31
Relyn Strom
82W–39L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.31
3.5
Amanda Poole
12W–13L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Andrea Holland
28W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Debra Schwarz
36W–27L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Candace Herman
117W–119L career · 5 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Megan Bergquist
111W–118L career · 4 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.13
Susan Palmer
52W–87L career · 6 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.10
Francis Katzer
25W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.10
3.5
Cathy Rinehart
105W–75L career · 5 lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.03
Kareem Thomas
43W–29L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.01
Liz Klausman
39W–46L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
2.85
Don Eccles
23W–101L career · no lines in 2025
90%10%<1%
2.82
3
Danielle Kruse
39W–50L career · 9 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
2.62
Karli Alderson
35W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Laura Leinwetter
50W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michelle Robinson
37W–20L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Nicole Hutton
33W–27L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.