Teams

CHATA/Anita Holle

2025 CHATA Tri-Level 40 & Over · 3.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.60 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Becki Sasser
published 4
3.86
Emily Mansour
published
3.78
Teresa Gunn
published
3.63
Patricia Graben
published
3.62
Lynn Pauley
published
3.50
Sharolette Rogers
published
3.47
Natalie Hale
published
3.44
Janice Ward
published
3.43
Luann Jones
published
3.42
Natalie Doerr
published
3.36
Jill Kemp
published
Anita Holle
published 3.5
Christine Minicozzi
published 3.5
Debbie Cox
published 3.5
3.24
Carla Hale
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lynn Pauley + Emily Mansour404 matchesnot enough data
Janice Ward + Jill Kemp303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Becki Sasser
23W–10L career · type A · no lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
3.87
Emily Mansour
18W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.86
Teresa Gunn
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.78
Patricia Graben
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.63
Lynn Pauley
16W–11L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.62
Sharolette Rogers
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
3.50
Natalie Hale
15W–12L career · no lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
3.47
Janice Ward
10W–7L career · no lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
3.44
Luann Jones
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
69%31%<1%
3.43
Natalie Doerr
19W–22L career · no lines in 2025
71%29%<1%
3.42
Jill Kemp
23W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.36
3.5
Anita Holle
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Christine Minicozzi
8W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Debbie Cox
9W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Carla Hale
22W–11L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.