Teams

CHAMISAL TC CW6.5A

2025 COMBO · Women 6.5

22 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
W#1 DoublesMonica Harvin / Amanda Reamer vs Kristie Solomon / Xiaoyun Han6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesBelinda Mei / Andrea Neiman vs Tomomi Albert / Laura Schenkelberg6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMelany Westwell / Amy Simpson vs Tina Tillotson / Kotim Pak6-0, 6-1
W#1 DoublesTammara Chavez / Sarah Saxby vs Denise Galocy / Carla Ruigh4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMelany Westwell / Jacqueline Bartlett vs Kristie Solomon / Lucy Olivares6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMonica Harvin / Linda Toplarski vs Jewel A Knofler / Deborah Baker6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 22 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Monica Harvin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.53
Tammara Chavez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.49
Melany Westwell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.46
Amy Simpson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.46
Yoko Wilson
published
3.44
Casey Riddell
published 3.5
3.38
Belinda Mei
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.34
3.33
Sarah Saxby
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.30
Debbie Dirgin
published 3.5
3.29
Gleidy Wetzel
published
3.28
Carolyn Gallego
published 3.5
3.17
Mary Welschmeyer
published
3.10
Linda Knowles
published
3.09
Jacqueline Bartlett
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.03
Andrea Neiman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.00
Amanda Reamer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.99
Linda Toplarski
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
Lynn Kovach
published
2.85
Brenda Murdock
published 3
2.81
Trinh Retterer
published
2.72
Nancy Nino
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda Toplarski + Jacqueline Bartlett044 matchesnot enough data
Linda Toplarski + Sarah Saxby213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Monica Harvin
13W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.67
Tammara Chavez
20W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%41%59%
3.53
Melany Westwell
6W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
3.49
3.5
Amy Simpson
7W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.46
Yoko Wilson
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Casey Riddell
7W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
Belinda Mei
4W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Cynthia Leigh Zerboni
13W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%13%
3.34
Sarah Saxby
8W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Debbie Dirgin
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
Gleidy Wetzel
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Carolyn Gallego
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Mary Welschmeyer
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.17
Linda Knowles
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.10
Jacqueline Bartlett
11W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%26%74%
3.09
3
Andrea Neiman
14W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.03
3
Amanda Reamer
9W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.00
Linda Toplarski
12W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%52%48%
2.99
Lynn Kovach
8W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%77%22%
2.89
3
Brenda Murdock
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%15%
2.85
Trinh Retterer
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
Nancy Nino
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%2%
2.72

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.