Teams

Kansas Aces

2025 KS 18 & Over Adult Outdoor League · 4.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 4.25 / KANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-06-28vs KSWC/OsbornePrasad/18&Over4.5WLost 13
L#1 DoublesLinda Johnson / Rachel Seitz vs Brittany Osborne / Jamie Inzer1-8
L#1 SinglesNikolett Krivek vs Snezhana Solovey5-8
L#2 DoublesValerie Glotzbach / Teresa Oneal vs Chassidy Weathers / Jena Dick4-8
W#2 SinglesElla Graham vs Jazzmyn Williams9-7
2025-06-28vs KSWC/OsbornePrasad/18&Over4.5WLost 12
L#1 DoublesLinda Johnson / Destiny MacE vs Jena Dick / Jamie Inzer7-9
L#1 SinglesNikolett Krivek vs Jazzmyn Williams3-8
W#2 DoublesValerie Glotzbach / Teresa Oneal vs Carolyn Huffman / Brittany Osborne8-6
2025-06-15vs KSWC/OsbornePrasad/18&Over4.5WWon 21
W#1 DoublesNikolett Krivek / Ella Graham vs Snezhana Solovey / Jazzmyn Williams8-6
W#2 DoublesTeresa Oneal / Valerie Glotzbach vs Brittany Osborne / Jena Dick8-6
L#3 DoublesRachel Seitz / Destiny MacE vs Amy Mathew / Carolyn Huffman7-9
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KSWC/OsbornePrasad/18&Over4.5W30114460
2Kansas Aces0341111115

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.86 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.32
Amy Wegner
published 4.5
4.24
Nikolett Krivek
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.98
Valerie Glotzbach
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.67
Destiny MacE
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.53
Teresa Oneal
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.44
Rachel Seitz
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
Ella Graham
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Melissa Goodman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rachel Seitz + Destiny MacE6652% games+7.7% vs expected
Teresa Oneal + Valerie Glotzbach224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Amy Wegner
40W–24L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
4.32
Nikolett Krivek
11W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
4.24
Valerie Glotzbach
39W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
3.98
4
Destiny MacE
85W–83L career · 10 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.67
Teresa Oneal
25W–50L career · 6 lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.53
Rachel Seitz
124W–64L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.44
Ella Graham
11W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Melissa Goodman
22W–27L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.