Teams

Viera Regional Park - Helton

2024 Brevard Combo 18 & Over - Women's Summer · 6.5 Women

17 players · average NTRP 3.38 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-07-25vs Winner/Suntree - SaundersSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKatharine Polvino / Jenny Mullowney vs Mary Ehrhard / Darien Lawrence5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesCuc Nguyen / Denise Stanley vs Lee Harrington / Mandy Smith7-5, 6-2
2024-07-18vs EFSC - LeiterWon 21
W#1 DoublesKatharine Polvino / Jenny Mullowney vs Sandra Edwards / Xu Sue Huang6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLyuda Saks / Denise Stanley vs Carol Becker / Shelly Deater4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSusan Wilkes / Michelle Ruether vs Karen Lee / Christine Small6-1, 6-3
2024-07-17vs Kiwi - WyandLost 02
L#2 DoublesDenise Stanley / Deena Helton vs Ruby Nevin / Bianca Lauretta6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesArletha White / Brenda Knox vs Barbara Decesari / Megan Schweitzer2-6, 1-6
2024-06-20vs Fee - RossWon 20
W#1 DoublesKatharine Polvino / Jenny Mullowney vs Char Lindsay / Marilyn Annis6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSusan Wilkes / Donna Paternoster vs Frances Verolla / Jacinta Iezzi7-6, 6-1
2024-06-13vs Winner/Suntree - SaundersWon 21
W#1 DoublesSara Hatfield / Jenny Mullowney vs Lee Harrington / Stephanie McIntosh4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDonna Paternoster / Altair Watson vs Dana Saunders / Elizabeth Pinchera7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesCuc Nguyen / Karen Kelly vs SARA BRESETTE / Veronica Scott5-7, 1-6
2024-06-06vs EFSC - LeiterWon 20
W#2 DoublesIliana Bleau / Jenny Mullowney vs Xu Sue Huang / Tee Wells6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMelissa Meikle / Michelle Ruether vs June Leiter / Emily Dwyer6-3, 6-2
2024-05-30vs Kiwi - WyandLost 02
L#2 DoublesDeena Helton / Susan Wilkes vs Tonya Cary / Ruby Nevin1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLyuda Saks / Karen Kelly vs Yvonne Salvatore / Nancy Hastings4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2024-05-09vs Fee - RossLost 01
L#2 DoublesArletha White / Iliana Bleau vs Gena Wools / Marilyn Annis1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Sara Hatfield
published
3.48
Cuc Nguyen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.43
Donna Paternoster
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.32
Heather Harris
published
3.29
Iliana Bleau
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Altair Watson
published 3.5
3.24
Michelle Ruether
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Amber Saxon
published 3.5
3.20
Lyuda Saks
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.20
Denise Stanley
published 3.5
3.15
Deena Helton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.03
Melissa Meikle
published
2.74
Arletha White
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.73
Susan Wilkes
published
2.70
Brenda Knox
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.68
Jenny Mullowney
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
Katharine Polvino
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Iliana Bleau + Deena Helton13659% games+8.8% vs expected
Deena Helton + Donna Paternoster141051% games−6.0% vs expected
Arletha White + Deena Helton18955% gamesnot enough data
Iliana Bleau + Michelle Ruether8449% gamesnot enough data
Brenda Knox + Donna Paternoster3845% gamesnot enough data
Brenda Knox + Deena Helton5252% gamesnot enough data
Arletha White + Iliana Bleau2547% gamesnot enough data
Brenda Knox + Michelle Ruether1535% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sara Hatfield
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
53%47%<1%
3.49
3.5
Cuc Nguyen
110W–58L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
Donna Paternoster
82W–75L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
3.43
Heather Harris
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Iliana Bleau
109W–93L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Altair Watson
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Michelle Ruether
90W–89L career · 2 lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Amber Saxon
5W–2L career · no lines in 2024
4%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Lyuda Saks
88W–77L career · 2 lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Denise Stanley
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Deena Helton
152W–88L career · 2 lines in 2024
15%84%1%
3.15
Melissa Meikle
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%42%58%
3.03
3
Arletha White
108W–132L career · 2 lines in 2024
4%92%3%
2.74
Susan Wilkes
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Brenda Knox
45W–66L career · 1 line in 2024
8%91%2%
2.70
3
Jenny Mullowney
62W–83L career · 5 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
2.68
Katharine Polvino
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.