Teams

3-MLong-Eno-18+ 3.5

2022 Eno River Singles 18 & Over · Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women Evening

6 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-07-29vs 1-SBrogden-Eno-18+Lost 01
L#1 SinglesSara Lawrence vs Wendy Lindberg6-7, 6-1, 0-1
2022-07-18vs 5-BGarrison-YMCA-SinWon 10
W#1 SinglesHannah White vs Jacqueline Yurkovich6-3, 7-5
2022-07-14vs 6-CPeterson-HVCCLost 01
L#1 SinglesSara Lawrence vs Mary Susan Easterling3-6, 1-6
2022-07-11vs 2-KTodd - Eno-18+ 3.5Lost 02
L#1 SinglesHannah White vs Cheryl Scott3-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesSara Lawrence vs Abby Olmsted1-6, 1-6
2022-06-29Lost 01
L#3 SinglesHannah White vs Kateri Salk-Gundersen6-7, 2-6
2022-06-20vs 5-BGarrison-YMCA-SinWon 10
W#2 SinglesSara Lawrence vs Blakeley Pritchard4-0
2022-06-13Won 10
W#3 SinglesHannah White vs Kimberly Silverman6-2, 6-3
2022-06-01vs 6-CPeterson-HVCCLost 01
L#1 SinglesHannah White vs Alana Argersinger6-3, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Hannah White
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #3 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.04
Sara Lawrence
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
2.97
Halle Amick
published 3
2.87
Suzanne Hallquist
published
2.82
Mary T Long
published
Peggi Hunter
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sara Lawrence + Mary T Long303 matchesnot enough data
Sara Lawrence + Hannah White303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Hannah White
87W–146L career · 5 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3
Sara Lawrence
160W–120L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%38%62%
3.04
3
Halle Amick
14W–21L career · no lines in 2022
<1%58%42%
2.97
Suzanne Hallquist
2W–17L career · no lines in 2022
84%16%<1%
2.87
Mary T Long
48W–104L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
2.82
Peggi Hunter
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.