Teams

Leon/Larson-Alvarez/8.5/Women

2022 Leon Combo 18 & Over · 8.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.83 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-11-16vs HerringSplit 11
L#2 DoublesEmily Serpico / Sherry Cady vs Cathy Kendall / Sara Rooney1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesCatherine Suber / Jacqueline Larson vs Jennifer Winegardner / Lisa Graganella6-3, 6-1
2022-11-09vs HerringWon 20
W#1 DoublesSusan Alvarez / Jennifer Kjellerup vs Anna Jones / Caroline Smith7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJacqueline Larson / Sherry Cady vs Lisa Graganella / Lisa Franson6-1, 7-5
2022-10-26vs HerringWon 20
W#2 DoublesSusan Alvarez / Sherry Cady vs Jennifer Britt / Sara Rooney6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJennifer Kjellerup / Pia Lehtonen vs Lisa Franson / Jennifer Winegardner6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2022-10-19vs HerringSplit 11
L#2 DoublesJacqueline Larson / Catherine Suber vs Amy Knight / Lisa Graganella6-2, 0-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSherry Cady / Jennifer Kjellerup vs Anna Jones / Jennifer Winegardner7-5, 7-5
2022-10-12vs HerringWon 10
W#3 DoublesJennifer Kjellerup / Emily Serpico vs Kim Thriffiley / Anna Jones6-4, 6-2
2022-09-28vs HerringWon 10
W#3 DoublesJennifer Kjellerup / Jacqueline Larson vs Jennifer Winegardner / Lisa Franson6-2, 6-4
2022-09-21vs HerringSplit 11
L#2 DoublesJacqueline Larson / Jessica Bahorski vs Sara Rooney / Jennifer Britt6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJennifer Kjellerup / Sherry Cady vs Kim Thriffiley / Lisa Franson6-3, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Jacqueline Larson
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.83
Emily Serpico
published 4
3.63
Jennifer Kjellerup
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.57
Pia Lehtonen
published
3.41
Sherry Cady
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Jessica Bahorski
published
Susan Alvarez
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Kjellerup + Sherry Cady13551% games−1.3% vs expected
Jennifer Kjellerup + Jacqueline Larson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jacqueline Larson
55W–49L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%50%50%
4.00
4
Emily Serpico
5W–1L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.83
Jennifer Kjellerup
143W–105L career · 10 lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
3.63
Pia Lehtonen
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.57
3.5
Sherry Cady
196W–173L career · 10 lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
3.41
Jessica Bahorski
3W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Susan Alvarez
4W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.