Teams

4 Belmont Williams

2022 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 4.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-06-04vs 1 Southampton LaneWon 21
W#1 DoublesKatherine Mueller / Suzanne Spiller vs Jill Campbell / Janice McGarity6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesTamara Beck Jacquet / Mindy Angel vs Karna Hyman / Widna Benitez4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesEsther Fratkin / Stacy Lukanuski vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-06-02vs 3 Belmont BerensLost 02
L#1 DoublesAlicia Cecil / Courtney Greiner vs Laura Lafors / Allyson Brand1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesEsther Fratkin / Stacy Lukanuski vs Susan Hanson / Clara Laing3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2022-05-28vs 6 Westwood KellyWon 31
W#1 DoublesLauren Palmer / Suzanne Spiller vs Becky Oatts / Elizabeth Wallace6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesKaren Deaver vs Elizabeth Kelly6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesStacy Lukanuski / Mindy Angel vs Kate Kristofak / Katherine Coleman6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesCourtney Greiner vs Sarah Oatts6-2, 6-1
W#1 DoublesBeth Robbins / Katherine Mueller vs Rebecca Loos / Irina Schaffernoth6-0, 6-1
W#2 SinglesEsther Fratkin vs Sabrina Connor6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCourtney Greiner / Tamara Beck Jacquet vs Tanisha Moseley / Leemore Burke6-3, 6-3
2022-05-07vs 5 Willow Oaks BlackwoodSplit 11
L#2 DoublesAlicia Cecil / Courtney Greiner vs Jennifer Holzberg / Jennifer Smith4-6, 1-3
W#3 DoublesTamara Beck Jacquet / Suzanne Spiller vs Christy Holt / Margie Ray6-3, 5-4
2022-04-30vs 1 Southampton LaneWon 30
W#1 SinglesKaren Deaver vs Karna Hyman6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAlicia Cecil / Courtney Greiner vs Jill Campbell / Susan Paullin7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesEsther Fratkin / Suzanne Spiller vs Cherie Lane / Tatiane Restani7-5, 6-4
2022-04-24vs 3 Belmont BerensLost 03
L#1 DoublesHunter Harrell / Beth Robbins vs Mary Napier / Laura Lafors2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesEsther Fratkin / Stacy Lukanuski vs Jackie Berens / Lindsey Howard3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesHeather Griggs / Courtney Greiner vs Jenny Murray / Lindsey Genter4-6, 1-6
2022-04-23vs 6 Westwood KellyWon 31
W#1 DoublesTamara Beck Jacquet / Karen Deaver vs Soozie Lewis / Becky Oatts3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesCourtney Greiner vs Ashley Wright Henry6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLauren Palmer / Stacy Lukanuski vs Brin Hause / Elizabeth Kelly6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBeth Robbins / Janet Broadway vs Elizabeth Wallace / Genevieve Alley1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 DoublesHeather Griggs / Courtney Greiner vs Bindhya Rusu-Mehes / Rebecca Loos6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLauren Palmer / Suzanne Spiller vs Denise Terrell / Mary Williams6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesHunter Harrell / Mindy Angel vs Daniela Otto / Leemore Burke2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-04-02vs 5 Willow Oaks BlackwoodLost 12
L#1 DoublesHunter Harrell / Beth Robbins vs Jennifer Holzberg / Joyce Steed2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesKaren Deaver vs Kirkland Hagerty6-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesEsther Fratkin / Stacy Lukanuski vs Kelly Stalls / Peyton Curdts6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.11 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.40
Suzanne Spiller
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.34
Lauren Palmer
published
4.19
Beth Robbins
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.15
Esther Fratkin
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
4.13
Courtney Greiner
usually #1 Doubles 25%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.11
Stacy Lukanuski
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.10
Katherine Mueller
published
3.98
Karen Deaver
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4.5
3.95
Tamara Beck Jacquet
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.94
Mindy Angel
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.89
Carol Gregory
published 4.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tamara Beck Jacquet + Karen Deaver1640% gamesnot enough data
Tamara Beck Jacquet + Suzanne Spiller314 matchesnot enough data
Courtney Greiner + Suzanne Spiller123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Suzanne Spiller
289W–111L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
4.40
Lauren Palmer
17W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
4.34
4.5
Beth Robbins
48W–53L career · 4 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
4.19
4.5
Esther Fratkin
35W–32L career · type A · 6 lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
4.15
4.5
Courtney Greiner
117W–118L career · 7 lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
4.13
4.5
Stacy Lukanuski
127W–117L career · 6 lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
4.11
Katherine Mueller
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
4.10
4.5
Karen Deaver
37W–56L career · 4 lines in 2022
55%45%<1%
3.98
4.5
Tamara Beck Jacquet
59W–106L career · 4 lines in 2022
64%36%<1%
3.95
4.5
Mindy Angel
54W–62L career · 3 lines in 2022
68%32%<1%
3.94
4.5
Carol Gregory
5W–2L career · no lines in 2022
80%20%<1%
3.89

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.