Teams

TRU:Trull Brook Green:Demarco

2021 EMA Mixed 40 & Over · 6.0 Mixed

10 players · average NTRP 3.17 / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-01-24vs TRU:Trull Brook Blue:KlebeLost 12
L#1 DoublesLinda Feng / David Feng vs LUIS MARTINEZ / Laura Naismith6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesRick Keene / Marie Normoyle vs SuzAnne Weisenbloom / Steven Silverman7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKevin Millis / Elizabeth Harvey vs Dan Gelinas / Sharon Sell1-6, 5-7
L#1 DoublesAndrea Colby / Paul Rheault vs Tim Curran / Colene Nardone3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLinda Feng / David Feng vs George Plourde / Heather Moore6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRick Keene / Marie Normoyle vs Mike Stuart / Jennifer Wieckowski2-6, 6-7
2020-12-27vs SFT:Spark F &T Blue:HigginsWon 30
W#1 DoublesLinda Feng / David Feng vs James McDaniel / Diane Sollars6-1, 0-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRick Keene / Marie Normoyle vs Karthik Subramanian / Mary Lou Medlock6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDonna Keene / Paul Rheault vs Brad Riley / Cathleen Burke7-5, 6-2
2020-12-11vs SFT:Spark F &T Red:SidemanSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLinda Feng / David Feng vs Cheryl Hemley / Kumar Ponnapalam5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesRick Keene / Marie Normoyle vs Laura Harley / Alexander Halkias6-2, 6-1
2020-11-13vs TRU:Trull Brook Blue:KlebeWon 21
L#1 DoublesLinda Feng / David Feng vs Marizela Klebe / LUIS MARTINEZ4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesPaul Rheault / Andrea Colby vs SuzAnne Weisenbloom / William Swiggart6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesRick Keene / Marie Normoyle vs Dan Gelinas / Laura Naismith6-3, 6-3
2020-10-16vs SFT:Spark F &T Blue:HigginsWon 20
W#1 DoublesDavid Feng / Linda Feng vs Deborah DonovanPerez / Erik Muench6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKevin Millis / Elizabeth Harvey vs Brad Riley / Cathleen Burke7-5, 6-3
2020-10-02vs SFT:Spark F &T Red:SidemanWon 21
L#1 DoublesAndrea Colby / Paul Rheault vs Alexander Halkias / Toni Cavallini3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesDavid Feng / Linda Feng vs Megan Evans / Joseph Hicks6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKevin Millis / Elizabeth Harvey vs Mary D'Aoust / Andrew Buttress6-3, 7-6
L#1 DoublesRick Keene / Marie Normoyle vs George Plourde / Wendy Bacheller2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesPaul Rheault / Donna Keene vs Mike Stuart / Jennifer Wieckowski2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKevin Millis / Elizabeth Harvey vs Jennifer Licciardi / Lewis Venezia6-7, 4-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · 6.0 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CED: Cedardale Blue:Stuart;Licciardi0819515157
2TRU:Trull Brook Blue:Klebe08141026221
3TRU:Trull Brook Green:Demarco08121226212
4SFT:Spark F &T Red:Sideman0881634236
5SFT:Spark F &T Blue:Higgins0871740263
6NETC:Net Gains;Feeney/Rogers092437123
7PAX:Paxton Blue:O'Connor09111634255
8PAX:Paxton Red:Heath09111636258
9SHR:Shrewsbury:Dronova/Stauffer0981939268

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.19
Linda Feng
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.11
Elizabeth Harvey
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
2.91
Andrea Colby
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.79
Paul Rheault
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
David Feng
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.61
Marie Normoyle
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Kevin Millis
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Leo DeMarco
published
Rick Keene
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Stephen Dapkiewicz
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrea Colby + Paul Rheault7651% games+2.6% vs expected
David Feng + Linda Feng142948% games+2.2% vs expected
Rick Keene + Marie Normoyle10457% games−6.2% vs expected
Elizabeth Harvey + Kevin Millis131349% gamesnot enough data
Paul Rheault + Marie Normoyle2346% gamesnot enough data
Paul Rheault + Linda Feng134 matchesnot enough data
Leo DeMarco + Marie Normoyle213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Linda Feng
74W–61L career · 7 lines in 2021
8%91%1%
3.19
3.5
Elizabeth Harvey
69W–84L career · 6 lines in 2021
21%79%<1%
3.11
3
Andrea Colby
93W–59L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%75%25%
2.91
Paul Rheault
58W–48L career · 5 lines in 2021
1%94%5%
2.79
3
David Feng
25W–41L career · 7 lines in 2021
not enough data
Marie Normoyle
25W–34L career · 6 lines in 2021
21%79%<1%
2.61
Kevin Millis
14W–18L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Leo DeMarco
34W–19L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Rick Keene
33W–30L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
Stephen Dapkiewicz
1W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.